What is wrong with adult stem cells?

If you can’t figure out google, I can’t help you.

…yet another vague, grumpy, ‘’taking my ball & going home’’ one-liner…

If you can’t figure out google, I can’t help you.

I did, and I found nothing that matches the claims you gave. The only thing I found was the story of the israeli boy.

So where did you get this info from? Why won’t you give us your source? Afraid it might not be very credible?

Ladies and gentlemen… Tseirpeht has left the building! Du du du.du du duh (Elvis theme song playing)

I guess it takes a while to scour the web for a response…

[www.whatiftheycallmybullshit.org]

If you can’t figure out google, I can’t help you.

tseirpeht, whether we know how to use Google or not, it’s irrelevant in the case of you not knowing what you’re on about. It’s okay though- it’s never too late to establish a relationship with science, logic and reasoning.

I don’t think that “amblessed lite” will answer. He seems bit watered down now that his buddy is off the radar…

Do I hear crickets…

Still waiting for a response tseirpeht

when it comes to tseirpeht I find any of his scientific claims to be dubious… The studies he quotes are questionable at best… He just needs to learn to leave scientific reasoning to the scientists…some things are just too complicated for him to understand. I looked some of his articles and found exactly what jimahl found…

I don’t get it… what actually MOTIVATES you (and amblessed, for that matter) to regularly post deceptive information? Do you LIE in the name of Jesus? Or are you totally oblivious, and just post it without verification, because it happens to agree with your opinions?

There is nothing wrong with adult stem cell research—its just embryonic stem cells are better at the job. As Jimahl has said..embryonic stem cells can grow to become every type of cell, where as adult cells are limited in what they can become.

When you can become ANYTHING why fix something that isn’t broken. I’ve never read any of those things you mentioned and I read plenty of med journals as well as my nursing journals. {•:)>

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=embryonic-stem-cells-cause-cancer-I-2009-02-19 Other soruces is just from googleing stem cell research. Harvard was also a big contributer.

The link doesn’t work. But I found it anyway. It says nothing about all the claims you made. It is a story about an israeli boy being treated in msocow with stem cells in 2001. He later developed a benign tumor. The highly experimental treatment was roundly criticized due to a lack of proper research into it.

Embryonic stem cells have more promise because they can become any cell in the body. Adult stem cells are limited in what they can become.

So where is the source for these claims? Are you trying to say research should stop simply because they haven’t been successful yet? Or is it because of your religious beliefs?

tseirpeht, care to provide the source for all of these claims?

As lex-icon stated already, scientists will try every avenue available to them. The real question is not whether adult stem cells are more promising than embryonic stem cells (which I would need to see some evidence before I believe it). The question is why would you make the decision not to study both? The only reason given for not pursuing embryonic stem cell research is religious. And religion has no place in science.

And I do believe he has. Yesterdays post was rather “official sounding” to me. (=

“screw you guys, I’m going home”

I don’t want to play with you anymore! stalks away pouting ]•=

If you can’t figure out google, I can’t help you.

Religion. The only logical reason not to use it, is population control.