'The often-overlooked Bush family member held a key security role during the apparent false flag attack on the United States-- he was on the board of directors for Stratasec, the security firm in charge of the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks.'
This is fact. This is the context of the remark I made about 9/11 that was recently used, completely out of context. Do you care about the Bush ties to 9/11? Or how the family made millions from security deals both as a result of the patriot act & the various wars?
*this isn't being a "conspiracy theorist" people. The money is very real. All I'm asking is simple, shouldn't we investigate? Where there is motive and opportunity, and money follows...shouldn't we at least make sure they weren't involved?
wait now, the line reads exactly like this "the Presidents elder brother was the head of the company that provided security services where the PLANES WERE HI-JACKED FROM" THATS HOW IT READS..SO THATS THE CONTEXT I TOOK IT IN. no mention to her about Stratasec. thats not the same thing... I'm thinkin he was working for the AIRLINE, thats how it reads ,or the airport... the planes weren't flown OUT of the World Trade Center---again--"company that provided security services where the plane were hi-jacked from" sorry if that confused me..but I live in Mass -and it made me wonder how I didn't know GW had a brother working at Logan, where the 2 Trade Center plane went out of...maybe you could have been more specific,, really no offense, but if I live that close and was that impressed by that statement, what does that make a person half-way around the globe think...man I'M just sick over what this election has done to everyone enough is a frikn nuff ---ITS ALL GEORGE BUSH"S FAULT---EVERYTHING
Wow, that seems to be stretching it a bit. He sat on the board of Directors...tell me exactly what anything short of a LAWS rocket could have prevented an aircraft from flying into the towers?
And last I heard the planes didn't come out of Dallas and weren't stolen, they were commercial flights that were hijacked out of Boston Logan. Now Logan had up to that point one of the worst security in the nation. That's one thing that certainly deserves some scrutiny.
As to the money, had I had any to invest, I too saw that security and related companies were a good investment following the tragedy of 11 September.
seao2florida, try reading about Marvin sometime, instead of replying to the tip of the iceberg I presented here.
Did Marvin invest in those companies before or after the patriot act? Answer: before.
Now...given the cover up of the Kennedy assassination (and yes, our own government agrees there was no magic bullet)...how is it so hard to believe that the same cr@p isn't happenging, again???
Do we refuse to learn from history, and we're simply doomed to repeat it? Or are we brave enough to ask the logical questions that should follow the extraordinary circumstance that happened right before our eyes?
...yep, he was a director in the company that has already been disolved, and was in charge of security at both the twin towers & the Dallas airport where the planes were stolen. :)
So, of course, I'm going to eyeball this as something odd. And no, it's not the election that made me curious, it's the coincidence...you know, if you're investigating something, shouldn't you cover all the angles until you solve the mystery?
I believe no matter who you are. if a crime has been commited then it warrants a full investigation. The evidence will speak for itself. of course the punishment will suit the crime in this case.
In this case, he's probably not a criminal.
But he should be held accountable for being part of a careless and irresponsible team that allowed the attack to be carried out in the first place
Certainly, this is America - no person, party, etc is above the law - if wrong doing found we should prosecute to the fullest extent of the law, no-one is immune - investigate !
the Dallas airport where the planes were stolen.
Are you talking about the planes that hit the twin towers??