Is a painting of Obama wearing a crown of thorns a fair portrayal??

But it’s so spooky…

I think it’s actually kind of appropriate. Obama seems to be almost a messiah character for so many people.

Okay, let’s take this step by step…

1. an artist has painted a painting…
2. Obama did not commission the work…
3. Obama is not attending the unveiling or dedication ceremony…
4. like most art, it is meant to encourage discussion…

Has Obama died for our sins yet . . . . Is he the son of God . . . .

NO

In my opninion it’s the wrong portrayal.

Huh? Crown of thorns?? …”The Truth”??? I’d say it’s a laughable portrayal…

p

That HAS to be the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard..

Who really cares. It is a peice of art. Either you like it, or you don’t. If it is meant as a parody, then I guess it is kind of funny. If it is meant to inspire adoration, then I would say it is a load of crap. But then again, it is no more whacky than any other religious iconography.

Amblessed, if this painting had protrayed John McCain as christ-like, would have bothered to ask this question? What bothers you more, Obama or the blasphemy?