Hypothetically, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, ect. would lose hundreds of billions if this where the case. Not to mention governments paying benefits to elderly who live longer than expected. Just a thought.
With that line of logic, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies would lose billions of dollars curing anything. Why bother to cure anything when you can just mask symptoms, and make sure the patient doesn't die? Cancer is a very difficult thing to treat because it is literally your body turning against itself. Its SO complicated, and science isn't even completely sure what makes it tick. Many different things factor into the possible causes of cancer. Just to give you an idea of how complex the inner network of the body and cancer, here is an article. Its very interesting and just goes to show you how flipping difficult it is to pin that little sucker down!
http://funadvice.com/r/153br9sn1ji
Cancer is not one disease but an entire class of diseases. In general cancer is never considered "cured" but rather in remission. Someone who has been successfully treated for cancer must have the condition monitored for the rest of their lives because the inactive cancer can become active again in the future. Some cancers can be easily managed while some other cancers are almost always fatal. Certainly over time the number of cancers that can be successfully managed will grow. Curing all cancers would be equivalent to preventing all birth defects or all infectious diseases.
For over 32 years, they have found a cure for cancer. But once the cure is found, then the support groups no longer get funds to find the cure. Actually in 1984, A man Named Matthew Zorgibuke( German) found the cure for cancer. But since he was from another country (New England), the U.S. couldn't fund the experiements to test the cure. And also, They believed that they were different kinds of medicine and cures that can cure them, but not the U.S. because of the different nutrients found in herbs and plants.
A very good point and the one I was waiting on, thank you. A few years back I watched a national news interview with a former nurse who worked in cancer treatment. She said that time and time again she was involved with medicines being used (in the experimental stage before FDA approval) that where working with great success. Each time the pharmaceutical co. would say "pull it" or discontinue use. Why?
well...i dont think it does...and even it does we are mostly unlikely to find it in the next ten or twenty years...
If a German found a cure for cancer, then why is Germany ahead of the US when it comes to lung cancer rates?
yes...........it does exist..........herbs.....
Thank you for the information
Good information. Thank you
I think it does exist.
Yes I think so
