We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What is the difference between Catholicism & Christianity?
What is the difference between Catholicism & Christianity?? Or the Catholic faith & the Christian faith??
First, my references for the existence of the letter of Pleny as well as the ‘didache’ are several: “The Lamb’s Supper” and “Swear to God” by Dr. Scott Hahn as well as “The DaVinci Hoax.” Additionally, the text of the didache can be found in the 1st volume of the book “Faith of the Early Fathers” compiled by Jurgens.
On the opposing side, I have not seen any citation for the assertion that the pope and Constantine collaborated to change the day of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday.
Second, the Catholic Church has not Changed the ten commandments from the way that they appear in the book of Exodus. If you actually count the number of verses, and the number of times God says “thou shall” or “thou shalt not.” you will find that there are actually 17 times. Catholics and Protestants just split them up differently.
(Protestants separate in the 1st commandment which is “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, that place of slavery. You shall not have other gods besides me. You shall not carve idols for yourselves in the shape of anything in the sky above or on earth below or in the waters beneath. You shall not bow down and worship them For I, the Lord, am a jealous God, inflicting punishment for their fathes’ wickness on the children of those who hate me down to the third and fourth generation; but bestowing mercy down to the thousandth generation, on the children of those who love me and keep my commandments.” They also combine the last two commandments which read, “You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife. You shall not covet your neighbor’s house, nor his male or female slave, nor his ox or [donkey], nor anytrhing else that belongs to him.”)
Third: I have not seen any citation supporting the claim that any pope, speaking in a papal capacity, declared himself to be God. On the contrary, each member of the Faithful professes at every Sunday Mass, “We believe in one God, the Father Almighty… We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ”
Finally, I say again as the Church has professed throughout the ages, we do not worship Mary. We do not believe that she is above Jesus, because he is the rightful heir to the throne, just as the queen mother would not be above the king.
Do we honor her as the Mother of God? Yes we do. The Council of Ephesus declared in AD 431 that Mary bears the title “Theotokos” (Greek for “one who bears God.) They also provided a sciptural basis for that assertion.
When the fullness of time had come,God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law to deliver from the law thoase who were subject to it (Gal. 4:4).
The title “Theotokos” was given in response to the Nestorian heresy which claimed that Mary was “Christotokos” (meaning that she was only the mother of Christ the man, not God the Son). It was actually intended to be an affirmation of the divinity and oneness of Chirst. Allow me to explain.
The Council of Ephasus declared that Christ has, while having two distint natures (human and divine), he has only one “hypostasis” (personhood). He is fully God, and fully man, but he is one person: a divine person. It is incorrect to say that he is a “human person”, because his “personhood” is derived from his divine nature rather than his human nature. He is a divine person who assumed a human body and a human soul, and was fully human, like us in all things but sin. Therefore, the person the Mary bore in her whom was God in the flesh. Thus we give her the title, Theotokos, which means Mother of God, or more precisely “God-bearer”.
Why do we portray Jesus crowning her? We assert that she is the woman depicted in Revelations 12: the woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and on her head a crown of 12 stars. For further reading on the subject, I suggest “Hail Holy Queen” by Dr. Scott Hahn.
EVERY WHERE that the educated man / woman BEHOLDS ~They see the OBVIOUS & apparent CHANGE .. in the PUBLIC attitudes IN the colonies & packs & mobs of pagan Catholics across this disgusting planet.
This is The complete CHANGE .. towards the NON Catholic.
MOST Catholics don’t know what the Catholic church Really HISTORICALY Teaches. /\ ~OR Catholics continue TO PLAY along in the incurably servile & slavish FOUNDATIONAL - PILLAR of all Romes, Roman~tic games. { THE Game of catholicism …which is.{ worship of IGGY~NORANCE }
The catholic church Teaches the following, in documentation & historical creed
The catholic church Teaches THAT A HERETIC IS ANYONE Who DOES NOT BELIEVE Every Article of CATHOLIC Faith
That A HERETIC is Anyone WHO IS NOT A MEMBER of the CATHOLIC Church
That HERETICS CANNOT GAIN ETERNAL LIFE Unless They GIVE UP Their FAITH & BE United With the CATHOLIC Church
The catholic church Teaches HERETICs Are NOT CHRISTIANS & DO NOT Worship the True GOD or Jesus Christ
HERETICS Are to Be CONDEMNED & PUNISHED, Even Just ON SUSPECION Alone, & Are DENIED ANY DEFENSE
ALL LAWS & Statues of ANY COUNTRY Which Prevent the CONDEMNATION & EXECUTION of Heretics ARE Null & Void
The Catholic Church Declares ALL HERETICS Anathema & HERETICS Are to BE BURNED
The catholic church Teaches
“HE IS A HERETIC who does NOT believe what the Roman Hierarchy teaches.” American Textbook of Popery, p 164 (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).“HERESY consists in a STUBBORN DENIAL of truths which have been DEFINED & proposed by the CHURCH as divinely revealed DOCTRINES.
“Any baptized PERSON who…obstinately DENIES or DOUBTS any of the truths PROPOSED for belief by divine & CATHOLIC FAITH, is a HERETIC.” Canon 1324-1325 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law. http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/3543/heretic.htm
“He is a HERETIC who dEVIATES from any article of FAITH.” The American Textbook of Popery, p 143, (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).
"Whoever 'obstinately' DENIES these (Catholic) truths, the DOCTRINAL commentary of Pope John Paul II says, falls under the censure of HERESY." Our Sunday Visitor, Analysis, July 19, 1998. A HERETIC is Anyone Who IS NOT a Member of the CATHOLIC Church
Whosoever will DEPART { From the CATHOLIC Church } must NEEDS be FOUND with HERETICS." St. Cyprian, The Epistles of Cyprian, Epistle LXXIII, #11. http://www.ewtn.com/library/PATRISTC/ANF5_8.TXT
"So the Christian is A CATHOLIC as long as he LIVES IN THE BODY: cut off from it he becomes A HERETIC-the life of the spirit FOLLOWS not the amputated MEMBER." St. Augustine, Sermon cclxvii., # 4 (Quoted by Pope Leo XIII in Satis Cognitum (On the Unity of the Church), Encyclical promulgated on June 29, 1896, #5. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_29061896_satis-cognitum_en.html
"Heretics bring SENTENCE upon themselves since they by THEIR OWN CHOICE withdraw from the CHURCH, a withdrawal which, since they are aware of it, constitutes DAMNATION. St. Jerome: “Commentary on Titus 3:10–11.” http://www.catholic.com/library/Salvation_Outside_the_Church.asp
MISGUIDED PEOPLE attempt TO PERSUADE themselves & others THAT MEN ARE NOT SAVED ONLY IN THE CATHOLIC RELIGION, but that even heretics may attain eternal life.”
Pope Gregory XVI, Summo Iugiter Studio (On Mixed Marriages), Encyclical promulgated on May 27, 1832, #2.
Heretics CANNOT Gain ETERNAL LIFE Unless They GIVE UP THEIR FAITH & BE United With the CATHOLIC Church
All OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, Jews or heretics CANNOT SHARE IN ETERNAL life & will GO INTO THE EVERLASTING FIRE which was prepared for the devil & his angels, UNLESS THEY ARE JOINED TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
Pope Eugenius I’ve, in “Bull of Union with the Copts”, Council of Florence, Session 11, on February 4, 1442.
Heretics DO NOT Worship the TRUE GOD or Jesus Christ
"Heretics (those who are NOT MEMBERS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH or who DO NOT HOLD TO CATHOLIC DOCTRINE) worship a GOD WHO IS A LIAR, & a CHRIST WHO IS A LIAR."St. Augustine, (quoted in “Patrologiae Cursus Completus: Series Graca”, by Fr. J. P. Migne, Paris: 1866, 42:207).
“A MANIFEST HERETIC is NOT a CHRISTIAN
St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, & others.” St. Robert Bellarmine, “On the Church Militant”.
Heretics Are to Be CONDEMNED & PUNISHED, Even Just ON SUSPECION ALONE, & Are DENIED Any DEFENSE
“ALL SECTS OF HERETICS ARE CONDEMNED & various PUNISHMENTS are appointed for them & their ACCOMPLICES.” Pope Alexander I’ve, The American Textbook of Popery, p 135 (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).
“For the SUSPICION ALONE OF HERESY, purgation is DEMANDED.” The American Textbook of Popery, p 156 (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).
“All defence is denied to heretics.” The American Textbook of Popery, p 153 (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).
ALL HERETICS, are assuredly to BE PUNISHED with suitable penalties OVER & ABOVE the PENALTIES imposed At the council of Ferrara*, ALL HERETICS, together TO receive their DESERVED PINISHMENT with Korah, & Dathan &..."… note ~~~{ THESE GUYS were swallowed alive up in a pit & died }Pope Eugenius I’ve, in Decree of the Council of Florence Against the Synod at Basel, Council of Florence, Session 7, on September 4, 1439.
(* The Penalties of expelling HERETICS who have not left the city within the said thirty days ARE TO BE EJECTED OUT OF THE CITY… DENIED them all COMMERCE & all articles NEEDED FOR HUMAN USE..
..If there are SOME WHO IGNORE these ORDERS of ours, DARING perhaps TO CONVEY ………, since it is written that THE RIGHTEOUS PLUNDERED THE UNGODLY, such persons may be DESPOILED without penalty by any of the faithful & tHEIR GOODS SHALL BE CEDED TO THE FIRST TAKERS.
“Pope Eugenius I’ve, in Ecclesiastical Penalties Against Members of the Basel Synod, Council of Ferrara, Session 31, February 15, 1438.
"...schismatics, blasphemers & as HERETICS, to BE PUNISHED as TRAITORS, & to have incurred the aforesaid censures & PENALTIES, & others TO BE INFLICTED, according as it shall seem good & justice shall persuade..."Pope Eugenius I’ve, in Monition of the Council of Florence Against the Antipope Felix V, Session 9, on March 23, 1440.
"Heretics bring SENTENCE upon themselves since they by their own choice WITHDRAW from the CHURCH, a withdrawal which, since they are aware of it, constitutes DAMNATION."St. Jerome: “Commentary on Titus 3:10–11.”
A GENUINE CATHOLIC who CONTINUES steadfast in the catholic FAITH, who beleives - ONLY THOSE THINGS - which THE CATHOLIC CHURCH holds UNIVERSALLY
It is therefore an INDISPENSABLE OBLIGATION for ALL CATHOLICS to adhere to the faith of the Fathers, to preserve it, to die for it &, on the other hand, to DETEST the profane Men, [ any NON CATHOLIC ] to dread them, TO HARASS THEM, & to ATTACK THEM.”
St. Vincent of Lerins, Commonitoria, PL 50:637, (quoted in The Apostolic Digest, by Michael Malone, Book 6: “The Book of Sentimental Excuses”, Chapter 4: “The Dogmas of Faith Admit No Alteration Whatsoever”).
All Laws & Statues of Any Country Which Prevent the Condemnation & Execution of Heretics Are Null & Void
“Statutes THAT IMPEDE the EXECUTION of THE DUTIES which appertain to the office of INQUISITORS are NULL & VOID.” Pope Urban I’ve, The American Textbook of Popery, p. 106 (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).
The Catholic Church Declares All Heretics Anathema
“Cardinal (Of Lorraine). Anathema to all heretics.
“Answer Anathema, anathema." The Council of Trent, "Acclamations of the Father at the Close of the Council", Edited & translated by J. Waterworth (London: Dolman, 1848).Heretics Are to Be Burned
She ( THE Catholic Church) DOES NOT CONTENT HERSELF with persuasion, ARGUMENTS of an INTELLECTUAL & MORAL order appear to her INSUFFICIENT, & SHE has recourse to FORCE, to CORPORAL PUNISHMENT, to TORTURE.”
The Rector of the Catholic Institute of Paris, H.M.A. Baudrillart, quoted in The Catholic Church, The Renassance, & Protestantism, p 182-183.
[Martin] Luther, never burned a heretic.’..This is the ignorance or impudence of Luther.
Luther is convicted of impudence & falsehood,–for that heretics were often burned by the [Catholic Church may be proved from many examples.”
Jesuit Robert Bellarmine, in Disputationes de Controversiis, Tom. II, Lib. III, cap. XXII, 1628 edition.
"There are many unquestionable cases of Protestants punished as heretics in NEARLY ALL THE LANDS WHERE ROMAN CATHOLICS HAVE HAD POWER, right down to THE FRENCH REVOLUTION [of 1798]." Catholic author G.G. Coulton, in The Death-Penalty for Heresy, Medieval Studies, No. 18, pp. 62, 1924 edition.
“A HERETIC MERITS the pains of FIRE...By THE GOSPEL, the canons, CIVIL LAW, & CUSTOM, heretics MUST BE BURNED.”The American Textbook of Popery, p 164 (quoting from the “”).
HERE ON THE OTHER SIDE of HELL we find another BEAST ON THE…
SCATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SECOND EDITION # 841… “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the creator…,.IN THE FIRST PLACE amongst whom ARE ‘’’THE MUSLIMS;…
…MUSLIMS; profess to hold the faith of abraham, and together WITH US [CATHOLICS]…THEY ADORE the ONE, merciful GOD,
..thats why the pope can kiss and stroke & BOW DOWN TO the unholy quran
Popes claim in catholic catechism 2 and ed 841 that’’
muslims;…these profess to hold the faith of abraham, and together with us [catholics]…they adore the one, merciful god, mankind’s judge on the last day
MAY 1985 SATANS POPE John Paul II repeats ROMES DECLARATION TO AUDIENCE OF THOUSANDS
THE POPE said: “CATHOLICS Muslims, WE have MANY THINGS IN COMMON as BELIEVERS and as human beings…WE BELIEVE IN THE SAME GOD
http://www.letusreason.org/RC25.htm & http://focusonjerusalem.com/tiesthatbind.html
,,,THE CATHOLIC GOD IS THE MUSLIM GOD
THATS WHY YOUR POPE CAN KISS & STROKE AND BOW TO THE UNHOLY QURAN
http://images.google.com/images?q=photos%20%20of%20pope%20kissing%20quran&hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=wi
The catholic sect….Damns….and condemns…the BIBLE BELEIVER / non catholic Christ ian…… as LOST. Headed for hell…
The catholic sect….Damns….and condemns…the BIBLE BELEIVER / non catholic Christ ian…… ~as DESERVING of whatever punishment the POPES can manipulate their frenzied mobs of Catholics to perform…~at whatever point or bowel of history at any given time…possible.
The catholic sect….Damns….and condemns…the BIBLE BELEIVER / non catholic Christ ian…… as serving ANOTHER EVIL JESUS….
Rome SAYS
“Heretics / NOT MEMBERS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ….. DO NOT HOLD TO CATHOLIC DOCTRINE) & worship a GOD WHO IS A LIAR, & CHRIST WHO IS A LIAR.”
BUT Muslims & ISLAM //OOH they ALL SERVE OUR GOD…..and we Kiss and BOW down to their QURAN *& service ALLAH
THIS IS ROMES …ATTACK ON THE BIBLE AND ITS believers,,, [ CHRISTS CHURCH ‘ ]]] contradiction,,,IS,,manifested
orion, what did glynescampbellgreeneyes say that made you think she was jewish? I didn’t see anything in her answer that indicated that.
“andyburton” needs to know the Catholic church and its followers don’t worship Mary versus Jesus who is the focus of our church. We believe Jesus founded our church first as he gave the obligation to St Peter to take care of His church. So Peter is our first pope. Mary is venerated she is not our God (we have reverence to her). Without her as a vessel we wouldn’t have had Jesus. God chose her and we venerate her because she accepted God’s calling. We pray for her intercession which means like our attorney she will pray higher up. But we don’t worship her and this is where Baptists want to differentiate themselves from us. By calling themselves Christians they try to separate from us but we are all Christians. “kameron with a k” needs to read history books. It is stated the Jews were first, then the Catholic faith after Christ, Orthodox,then Anglican, Episcopalian, Lutheran, Presbyterian and Baptist and so on. We are Christians but we have a pope where the other’s don’t. So we are not a sect but the first Church of Jesus Christ.
Hope I helped clean up what is unknown Mama K
PRESTON ~ DAWKNESS MY WIFE has done ALL homework
it is ABVIOUS THAT MY WIFE HAS A GREAT KNOWLEDGE OF GODS WORD…AND seeks the truth,,,…
THE GRAMMER…AND ROMAN~TIC ._.SENTENCE STRUCTURES…REMAIN SLACKING…SO JESUS EXAMPLE CAN BE CONTINUED…/// IN DOUBLE SPEAK. MORE CONFUSION & PUZZLES FOR THE WILLING IGGY-NORANT
THE WORD of God HAS made IT ABUNDENTLY clear~~~Christ DID /// mean ALL that HE SAID in HIS complete WORD, THE BIBLE…
IN 2Ti 2:15 God commands “ Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 1.
Christ Did indeed SAY that his “ THIS “ FLESH */BLOOD / MEAT profited nothing: BUT the words that HE speaks unto MAN.~~~ IS THE spirit, & life.
THIS “ FLESH Greek ,, ho he? to-_- This, That,The. it, etc.” THIS ho, hay “ FLESH */BLOOD / MEAT profited nothing: BUT the words that HE speaks unto MAN.~~~ IS THE spirit, & life.
THE WORD of God HAS made IT ABUNDENTLY clear THAT Jesus CLEARLY rebuked the Assumptions of the Pagan, Catholic mob of perverts. ~~~ The very crowd.. Who JESUS demanded,, ! “” They did not BELEIVE…~… for they TOO. Tried to claim…HE ment HIS physical…Meat./ Flesh & Blood…
Joh 6:63 It is the spirit that quickened; THIS flesh profited nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. 64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
2.
THE WORD of God HAS made IT ABUNDENTLY clear WHY CHRIST did NOT take it back? When the UNBELEIVERS/ "PAGAN /catholics" left him,
CHRIST did Not say, 'wait guys come back -
Jesus did NOT try…. to deceive THE PAGAN CATHOLIC UNBELEIVERS...bec they were already deceived & unbelieving perverts ….WHOM JESUS CLAIMED, TO Himself…Jesus claimed to . CONTINUE their unbelief ….on purpose…..
HE continued their deliberate perversity & willfull reprobate,. willfull ignorance…
Jesus indeed DID claim to use "such double-speak. Parables..&. mysterious puzzles?
God Wrote the BIBLE: in GREEK / HEBREW & expects us to learn, & Study & rightly divide the word of truth.
Rightly divide the word
Greek 3718 orthotomeo To make a straight cut, to dissect (expound) correctly (the divine message): - rightly divide.
Mat 13:10 the disciples ASKED JESUS Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
Mat 13:11 Jesus said "Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
Mat 13:34 All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:
Jesus claimed to use "such double-speak. parables..&. mysterious puzzles ?
Mat 21:44 Jesus warned the Chief Priests that they could fall on this stone & be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
Mat 21:45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.
Mar 4:11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, { without Greek 1854 exo? ex'-o Out (side, of doors), literally or figuratively: - away, forth, (with-) out (of, -ward), strange.
but unto them that are without, { without Out (side, of doors, away, out (of, - strange.
all these things are done in parables:
Jesus claimed to use "such double-speak. Parables ..&. mysterious puzzles ?
Mar 4:12 That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.
Luk 8:9 And his disciples asked him, saying, What might this parable be?
Luk 8:10 And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
Jesus claimed to use "such double-speak. parables..&. mysterious puzzles ?
Luk 8:9 And his disciples asked him, saying, What might this parable be?
Luk 8:10 And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
Jesus comanded~~ "take up your cross & follow him
Mat 10:38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.
Mat 16:24 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Mar 10:21 Then Jesus said""" and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
Mar 8:34 Jesus said to the disciples ..."" Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Luk 9:23 And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.
Luk 14:27 And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.
IN Mark 10:21 ~~~JESUS, did not mean FOR THEM to TROMP AROUND through all the villages dragging a literal wooden cross behind you, taking beatings & SPITTLE LIKE thousands of TODAYS catholics & pagans do today.
He obviously meant to pattern your life after his, & imitate his ways. / as / Scripture is filled with symbols,{ parables & types of ” Christ.
Luk 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
Greek 3404 miseo? mis-eh'-o To love less:
This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.' In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, 'This cup is the New Testament
Testament in Greek 1242 dee-ath-ay'-kay A disposition, that is, (specifically) a contract (especially a devisory will): - covenant, testament.
A contract in my BLOOD …in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.
' For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim / show / the Lord's death until he comes
proclaim Geek 2605 kat-ang-gel'-lo.. To proclaim, promulgate: - declare, preach, shew, speak of, teach.
THE WORD of God HAS made IT ABUNDENTLY clear THAT The cup and bread...proclaims...teaches, shows and speaks..of...the Lords death
...it is never...a offering..of sacrifice..or a ..substitute or reinactment of anything...
IT IS NOT A MASS / MOCK sacrifices of Jesus, ~ AS Catholic Catechism, SAYS ~ '?? Mass is the same` CHRIST as }}A VICTIM & sacrifice…. THE SAME sacrifice on the cross ' [My Catholic Faith, p. 286
The cup and bread...proclaims.and ..teaches shows and speaks..of...the Lords death
.it is never...a offering..of sacrifice,,or THE PRESENCE OF CHRIST,,OR A VICTIM...AS ON THE CROSS...TO BE BOWED TO...WORSHIPED..AND SEEN AS CHRIST HIMSLEF..
THE GREEK WORD EUCHARIST / eucharisteo MEANS LITERALY "" Greek 2168
yoo-khar-is-teh'-o " To be grateful, that is, (actually) to express gratitude (towards);(give) thanks (-ful, -s)"
THE catholic does not want you to use or study the Greek & Hebrew. BIBLES
He seeks to divide the flock from all education, truth & honor & PROMISES of GOd keeping his WORD...and preserving the BIBLE / BIBLION
THE whole gust of the CATHOLIC REPROBATE...in this entire...MOCKING debate response is equalvelant to another CATHOLIC debate ./ a month ago
THIS CATHOLIC CLAIMED...THE WORD BIBLE...IS NOT IN THE BIBLE...THEREFORE GODS WORD...IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS WE FUNDIES MAKE IT OUT AS TO BE...
Greek 976 biblos bib'-los... "A scroll of writing: - book.
Rev22:9, Rev22:7, Rev 21:27, Rev20:15 Luk 20:42 and THROUGHOUT matthew, mark luke john acts romans...the entire NEW TESTAMENT speaks of THE WORD OF GOD...using the GREEK WORD~~~ Biblos / Bible...and every single time...it refers...to THE SCRIPTURES…///...
you CAN BE RESTING ASSURED in the same regard & mode ...THAT ALL CATHOLICS ARE COMPLETE LIARS...
Catholicism,..has been around for more than 2000 years...Since that...Satan established His catholic church in the Garden of Eden & caused the fall of man..through complete lies...
Catholicism will be around till the end of the world...AND this makes them MOST proud...
PRESTON DAWKNESS is in a battle against CATHOLIC LIES...not in a grammer,,,contest,,,but the catholic uses any means, to divert,,,meaning,,,attention & reality ..To make the GREEk. HEBREW and very word of God as confusing as possible...
CHRIST did not establish a church...by speaking in RIDDLES...{PARABLES...& MYSTERIOUS puzzles to the catholics/ unbeleivers... of His time..
CHRIST established his church to receive...the BIBLE
12 times in the book of rev...JESUS HIMSELF COMANDS JOHN Saying,, What thou seest, write in a book, & send it unto the churches. JESUS NAMED THESE 7 MAIN bible receiving CHURCHES..
ROMES CHURCH OR CATHOLIC / sects or ANY OF THEIR PAGAN...CULTIC TRADITIONS WERE NEVER IN THE BIBLE
Joh 10:35 JESUS CLEARLY STATED the word of God came TO THE JUDGES & the Scripture cannot be broken;
JESUS CLEARLY SAID TRADITIONS OUT OF GODS WORD. SCRIPTURES..ARE void , vain. non effect. & man made
THE N.T- BIBLE WAS WRITTEN BY ALL JEWS..& 1 GENTILE MAN..THE EARLIEST BIBLE OUT OF AFRICA IS THE VETUS ..BIBLE OF 200 AD CATHOLIC PERVETRTS INVENTED IN THE 3 RD
AND 4 TH CENTURY FROM A PAGAN GARBAGE CAN IN ROME HAS-NOTHING TO DO WITH THE BIBLE
The whole /complete Bible, based on Greek manuscripts of N.T. was the Vetus Itala OF 200 AD out of N. Africa
Vetus Itala OF 200 AD WAS the WHOLE New Testament Bible...complete in thirty-eight manuscripts, its Old-Testament text survived only in parts.
Catholic Enc Vol. XV, © 2007 http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15367a.htm
the catholic wants to convince you that the bible is so wrong without him there to remind you he is right
Thats why Jesus clarified the oral traditions,,were corrected..by the written tradition ….outside of Gods word,,
Jesus clearly said is all. void , vain. non effect. & man made.
paul- Main elder & MASTER BUILDER OF THE CHURCH/ BY THE Holy Spirit. PAUL..wrote 14 BOOKS/ Clearly said ,,all written scriptures for correction, doctrine, reproofing and perfecting.. PAUL COMANDED HIS WRITINGS,/ bible, books, BIBLIOS…..be SENT TO ALL BROTHERS,ALL CHURCHES
THE HOLY SPIRIT,...COMANDS /// WRITINGS,/ bible, books, be SENT TO ALL BROTHERS,ALL CHURCHEs and obeyed as the correction, doctrine, reproofing and perfecting.Remember when the pope was shot during an assassinate attempt?
All he was saying over and over was ‘dear Mother Mary save me’ (paraphrased). He did not mention Jesus at all, not once.
Also, while he was in the hospital they placed a picture of Mary on his thrown chair…not a picture of Jesus, but Mary. Now if that isn’t worshipping I don’t know what is!
prestondakness,
You are trying to make the case that Christ didn’t really mean what he said, but I must be blunt: Your answer is so grammatically poor that it is nearly impossible to understand. You have mixed in a great deal of bible verses with your own wordings and interpretations, and in the process completely abandoned any context or hope of making your case. From what I can gather of the mumbo-jumbo, it appears you are trying to be deceptive in order to deny what is so abundantly clear about the real presence of the Mass in the bible. Jesus went through great pains to make it clear that the Eucharist is really his body and blood. Unlike other parables or symbolic messages in the bible, Christ affirms the Mass and his Body and Blood seven different times in the bible. The fact that some of his disciples said it was hard to hear is the nail in the coffin. Did Christ take back what he said. Christ says,my flesh is REALLY food..By blood is REALLY drink. When his followers said this was hard to hear or believe, did he take it back? When they left him, did he say, “wait guys come back - I was only speaking symbolically’? “ It’s pretty obvious, he was being literal. You tried to say that Jesus told them they were wrong for believing what he told them. Why would Jesus try to deceive them with such double-speak? Did God expect us to learn Greek to know what he said, and made so obvious and plain below?
John 6: 53-56 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
If you don’t believe Christ meant what he really said above, then how do you explain Apostle Paul’s description of the Mass?
1 Corinthians 11 For, in the first place, when you assemble as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you; and I partly believe it, for there must be factions among you in order that those who are genuine among you may be recognized. When you meet together, it is not the Lord’s supper that you eat. For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal, and one is hungry and another is drunk. What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not. For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves truly, we should not be judged. But when we are judged by the Lord, we are chastened so that we may not be condemned along with the world. So then, my brethren, when you come together to eat, wait for one another– if any one is hungry, let him eat at home–lest you come together to be condemned. About the other things I will give directions when I come.
This passage from Paul should bring chills down your spine. He is speaking of the Catholic Mass, and receiving the Eucharist. Note, Paul indicates the presence of the Lord in the wine and bread? Note, how Paul warns it is a serious offense to receive the Eucharist of the Lord in a state of sin?
This, is the Catholic Mass, as described in 53AD, and how Catholics have practiced around the world for over 2000 years.
prestondakness,
I must be blunt: Your answer is so grammatically poor that it is nearly impossible to understand. You have mixed in a great deal of bible verses with your own wordings and interpretations, and in the process completely abandoned any context or hope of making your case. From what I can gather of the mumbo-jumbo, it appears you are trying to be deceptive in order to deny what is so abundantly clear about the real presence of the Mass in the bible. Jesus went through great pains to make it clear that the Eucharist is really his body and blood. Unlike other parables or symbolic messages in the bible, Christ affirms the Mass and his Body and Blood seven different times in the bible. The fact that some of his disciples said it was hard to hear is the nail in the coffin. Did Christ take back what he said. Christ says,my flesh is REALLY food..By blood is REALLY drink. When his followers said this was hard to hear or believe, did he take it back? When they left him, did he say, “wait guys come back - I was only speaking symbolically’? “ It’s pretty obvious, he was being literal:
You tried to say that Jesus told them they were wrong for believing what he told them. Why would Jesus try to deceive them with such double-speak?
John 6: 53-56 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
If you don’t believe Christ meant what he really said above, then how do you explain Apostle Paul’s description of the Mass?
1 Corinthians 11 For, in the first place, when you assemble as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you; and I partly believe it, for there must be factions among you in order that those who are genuine among you may be recognized. When you meet together, it is not the Lord’s supper that you eat. For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal, and one is hungry and another is drunk. What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not. For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves truly, we should not be judged. But when we are judged by the Lord, we are chastened so that we may not be condemned along with the world. So then, my brethren, when you come together to eat, wait for one another– if any one is hungry, let him eat at home–lest you come together to be condemned. About the other things I will give directions when I come.
This passage from Paul should bring chills down your spine. He is speaking of the Catholic Mass, and receiving the Eucharist. Note, Paul indicates the presence of the Lord in the wine and bread? Note, how Paul warns it is a serious offense to receive the Eucharist of the Lord in a state of sin?
This, is the Catholic Mass, as described in 53AD, and how Catholics have practiced around the world for over 2000 years.
Since Christainity has been around for almost 2,000 years (the first followers of Christ still considered themselves Jews) it has a rather elaborate family tree.
Catholicism is the trunk from which all modern forms of Christianity have branched. Early on there were other branches of Christianity that died out or were wiped out as heretical after Constantine made Christianity the Religion of the Roman Empire.
The Eastern Orthodox branch of Christianity split with the Catholic church in the 11th c. because they felt that the Catholic church was straying from the original teachings of the appostals
The Anglican Church or the Church of England formed in the 17c. largely because King Henry VIII could not get an annulment from Queen Catharine of Aragon who provided the King no male heirs. When Pope Clement VII refused an annulment King Henry started the Anglican church which gave him the annulment he sought.
Martin Luther’s 95 theses challenged many aspects of the Catholic church. His challenges inspired the Protestant Reformation from which the Protestant branch of Christianity came also in the 17th c.
The Orthodox, Anglican, and Protestant are the main branches from the RCC though there are a few smaller ones. Recently in the news was Mel Gibson’s Traditionalist Church which opposed Vatican 2 changes from the 1960s.
I do note that certain sects of Christians refer to themselves as Christains but not others. They see themselves as the only true Christians and believe that all others have strayed.
In response to levzeroni:
It is incorrect to say: “Christians know they sin and ask for forgiveness so that through faith and grace and good deeds ALONE they will recieve heaven. Catholics believe that through good deed alone they will get into heaven.”
The “Catechism of the Catholic Church” (CCC) cleary asserts the necessity of both faith (as in belief) and faith acting in love (what you call good works). Since you seem to dispute that Catholics belive in the necessit of faith, I will provide a reference.
“Believing in Jesus Christ and in the One who sent him for our salvation is necessary for obtaining that salvation. ‘Since without faith it is impossible to please (God)’ and to attain to the fellowship of his sons, therefore without faith no one has ever attainted justification, nor will anyone obtain eternal life ‘but he who endures to the end’” (CCC 161; internal quotes from “Dei Filius” 3; cf Mt. 10:22; 24:13; Heb 11:16; Council of Trent DS 1532)
The other part of levzeroni’s response dealt with Catholic’s praying to saints.
This issue was already addressed above, so I will not dwell on it long, but I will address it again briefly.
The New testament asserts that those who have died are alive in Christ. Christ himself tells the Sadducees that God calls himself the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and that he is not the God of the dead, but of the living (see Mt. 22:32)).
When we pray to saints, we are only asking for their prayers. James’ letter points out that the prayers of the just people are worth much in the eyes of God. The saints pray for us because we ask them to. It’s just like asing your mother, or your friend, or your pastor to pray for you. Furthermore, the saints in heaven are like the angels: they constantly behold the face of God. Unlike our earthly friends who might forget to pray for us, the saints don’t forget, because they see how depsperate our situation really is. They ask God face-to-face what our earthly intercessors may forget to ask.
“glynescamp…is talking about the 7th day Sabbath, which the Jewish religion observes.”
and several christian denominations keep the Sabbath in similar manner as in Judaism, but observance ends at Saturday sunset instead of Saturday nightfall. Seventh-day Adventists and Seventh Day Baptists have found the Sabbath an important part of their beliefs and practices since the mid-19th century. They and others believe that keeping the seventh-day Sabbath is a moral obligation arising out of the Ten Commandments, and honors God as Creator and Deliverer.
on a previous question you said that you were seventh day adventist… ameoba said: ‘The Seventh-day Adventist Church officially does not ordain women and the co-founder of the church, Ellen G. White, was a woman.’ orion said “If this were true then why do we have a female pastor? It is because we do ordain women as pastors.”
do you not observe on the seventh day?
28 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her. 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. 31 But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, 32 I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. 33 And when the multitude heard this, they were astonished at his doctrine. Matt 22:28-33 (KJV)Read the context, Jesus quoted God. “…have you not read that which was spoken unto you by God, …” Stop reading what men write and read the Scriptures, I.e. the New Testament that repealed the 1st (OLD) Testament. You will also find that other Sabbaths were kept–Passpver Sabbath, etc. You will find that church is not churches, except in Rev. where congreations was translated churches speaking of the seven congreations of the church of Christ. You will also find that Jesus the Christ founded His church on the confession of Peter and the confession is the “rock” not Peter. Search the scriptures.
aarthur said: “the saints in heaven are like the angels: they constantly behold the face of God. Unlike our earthly friends who might forget to pray for us, the saints don’t forget,…”
The Bible tells us that the dead “sleep” and “know nothing” in other words when a person dies they do not go straight to heaven or hell, they stay in the grave until the trumpet call of Jesus at His second coming. Then the graves will open and all who have died shall rise. So, there are no saints in heaven.
The dead are dead in the grave. Only a very few human beings have accented into heaven. Those who were mentioned in the Bible and no more. Believing in the concept that the dead ascend into heaven as saints is teaching spiritualism, which is Satan’s favorite subject…it confuses people causing doubt in God.
God said that ‘in the day ye shall eat of the fruit of the tree ye shall surely die’. But Satan said ‘ye shall not surely die but be as gods’ Satan is telling us that we will never die and that God is wrong and if we buy into the idea that the dead are in heaven or hell then who are you believing Satan or God…I choose God and His words.
Most of my friends are Catholic, and as such, we have discussed religion many times, therefore I feel that I can bring up at least one difference here.
Catholics worship Mary as part of the God-head
In response to Andyburton: Catholics do not worship the Virgin Mary.
I noticed someone before say that Catholics “venerate” Mary, which is correct. But most people don’t understand the difference between veneration and worship. “Venerate” means “to honor”. We honor Mary because she is the Mother of the Lord (see Lk 1:43; Gal 4:4). She was truly the mother of Jesus of Nazareth.
Because Jesus was perfect and blameless under the law, he followed all the commandments, including the command to “honor thy Father and thy mother” (see Paul’s letter to the Romans). We just follow Christ’s example of honoring his mother.
Why do Catholics care about honoring Mary at all? Isn’t she dead?
In the creed, we profess that we believe in the “communion of saints.” The saints are those people who have died in God’s grace, and are in heaven with him. We take Christ at his word that God “is not God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive” (Lk. 20:38).
When we say we “honor” or “venerate” Mary (of any of the other saints) we mean that we respect her for cooperating with God’s plan. The Saints are God’s masterpieces. They only made it to heaven because of his grace at work in their lives. When we honor the masterpiece, we give honor to the artist that created it.
Furthermore, because the saints are “alive in Christ” and in heaven with God, they have the ability to pray for us here on earth. St James tells us “The prayer of the righteous man has great power in its effects” (Jas. 5:16). We know the saints are righteous people if they are in heaven, and God will listen to their prayers.
That’s why everytime we “pray to” Mary or any of the other saints, we always use the words “pray for us.” It’s just like asking your mother or your sister to pray for you. As a matter of fact, it’s better than that, because mothers and sisters and everyone else on earth has a tendency to get distracted in a way that people in heaven don’t have to worry about.
The Catholic Church has always tried to make it clear that we don’t “worship” mary because we recognize that Mary is not God. We worship God, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. We ask the saints to pray for us because they are constantly in the presence of God, and can pray perfectly.
Roman Catholics are what???
The Catholic system was founded by the Roman Emporer Constantine, AD 321. Constantine actually killed christians before he converted into christianity himself, however he changed the true Christ like practices by introducing paganism and changing the holy Sabbath day which is originally Saturday, Consantine was a sun god worshipper therefore took it upon them selves to change Gods holy day the seventh day to a Sunday.
Eusebius who was a bishop and a friend and flatterer of Constantine claimed that Christ had transferred the Sabbath to Sunday! Not a single testimony of the scriptures was produced in proof of the new doctrine! The Pope is the anti-Christ! Why do I say that? Well lets first look at Exodus 20;
GODS FIRST COMMANDMENT: Thou shall not have no other gods be fore me.
(The Catholic sun god is worshipped because the sabbath day was changed to sunday worshiping their sun god.) Broken
SECOND COMMANDMENT: Thou shall not bow before idols.
(Meaning bowing to an image, venerate, honor) (Every day Catholics bow to statues of Mary and images of saints) you cannot bow to a piece of concrete or wood and ask it to pray for you! it is not going to hear you or aknowledge you in any shape or form.
The Pope allows and even expects catholics to bow before him even worship him where ever he goes! (Broken)
FOURTH COMMANDMENT: Remember the Sabbath day and keep it Holy. In it you shall do no work, for the Lord Blessed it and Hallowed it. ( Every Catholic goes to church on Sunday, and go about their normal business on the real Sabbath day.) Broken
Mathew 5:19 : Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven
Now this is the Truthful difference between Christians and the anti- Christ Catholics. Any one that is not Catholic is called Prodestant (meaning Protesting against catholicism)
I am familiar with the bible refering to the dead as “those who have fallen asleep,” but I have not seen those portions saying that the dead “know nothing.” In any case, we still hold that those who have fallen asleep in Christ are not truly dead, but are alive in Christ. Jesus refers to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as “living, because all live to him” (Lk. 20:38).
When Christ died on the cross, “the tombs also were opened, and… saints who had fallen asleep were raised, and coming out of the tombs after his resurrection they went into the Holy City and appeared to many” (Mt. 27:52-53 note the use of the past tense). When St. Paul described the Old Testament saints, he said: “Since we are surrounded by a such a great cloud of witnesses…” (12:1). The only reason that the saints can be said to be living is because of the power of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.
It has been said that only those saints who are mentioned in the Bible are in heaven and no more. I have to ask: Where in the Bible does it say that only those saints who are mentioned in the Bible are in heaven? In the Old Testament, Elijah is portrayed as being taken up in chariots of fire, but Moses dies. However, at the transfiguration, Jesus converses with both Moses and Elijah.
When Jesus tells the story about the rich man and Lazarus, he depicts Abraham as being in heaven (in fact, the Jews have referred to heaven as “the bosom of Abraham”). Abraman converses with the rich man about the possible conversion of his friends and relatives on earth Lk. 16:22-31).
The Catholic Church does teach that the souls of the dead are in heaven, but it is not spiritualism in the strictest sense of the word. The Church also strongly affirms the belief in the resurrection of the dead. (Every Sunday at Mass, every memeber of the faithful professes the words “We look for the resurrection of the dead” in the creed.”) We don’t believe that the body is bad. On the contrary, we believe that the body and the soul will be raised on the last day.
Moving on… The quote from the Book of Genesis is usually rendered in english bibles as “In the day that you eat of it [the fruit of the tree] you shall die” (Gen 2:17). However when the verse is rendered in Hebrew, it actually contains a double “death”; it could either be understood “by death you shall die” or “you shall die the death” (see “A Father Who Keeps His Promises” by Scott Hahn). The death that mankind endures because of the sin of Adam is a physical and a spiritual death, but in Christ, we have the ability to conquer both the physical and the spiritual. Since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead; just as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
And with our faith (belief and faithfulness) in Christ, we become “sons of God,” “co-heirs with Christ,” and “partakers of the divine nature” (see Gal 4:4-7; 2 Pet. 3-4).
The term Christian applies to all those believers who affirm the existence of the Trinity, the full divinity and full humanity of Christ Jesus, and the Sacrament of Baptism.
The term “Catholic Church” uses the term “catholic” which is the Latin word for universal. The earliest Christians used the term “Catholic Church” in writing around the end of the 1st century (see letters of St. Ignatius of Antioch). It is meant to denote the communion of all believers: the “one body” of Christ.
In the early centuries that followed, the Church adopted creeds in which all believers professed liturgically “I believe in… The Holy Catholic Church” (baptism) and “We believe in One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church” (Eucharistic Liturgy).
Most Christian ecclesial communities still profess a belief in the creeds. The institutional Church still lays claim to all four marks of the Church: oneness, holiness, catholicity and apostolicity.
While other Christian ecclesial communities also claim all four pillars, oneness and apostolicity seem to be questionable. Ever since the Reformation, Protestant groups have been splintering and spilliting off from each other over every piece of doctrine.
Along the same lines, the institutional Catholic Church has the historical ability to claim apostolicity in the form of “apostolic succession.” The apostles (Jesus’ closest followers) appointed succesors for themeselves to fulfill their mission of “preaching the gospel to all nations” (Mt. 28:20; see Acts 1).
The successor to the office of St. Peter is the person we call the “pope”. As the successor to St. Peter, he has the same guarantee that Christ gave to Peter: “Amen I say to you Simon you are rock [peter] and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. Behold, I will give you the keys to the kingdom; whatever you bind of earth will be bound in heaven and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” (Mt. 16:17-19)
The pope and the bishops in union with him make up the “magesterium,” which is the “sacred teaching office of the Church”. It was under magisterial authority that the Church compiled the Sacred Scriptures during the first millenium. They also have the responsibilty of interpreting the Scriptures. There there was no authority in place to interperate the bible, then anyone could start a new Church based on their own interpretation of any 5 bible verses (which is exactly what happened after the Reformation)
In Short, the Catholicism is the “original Church” that Christ founded on St. Peter. The other Christian communities broke off from that Church throughout the centuries.
glynescamp…is talking about the 7th day Sabbath, which the Jewish religion observes.
doctrine is the difference between all bible believing churches.
Christianity is any religions having to do with god and Christ
Catholicism. Is a sect. Like a subgroup. Of Christianity. They beleive god sent his only son Jesus Christ to die for the sins of Man. And all that.
There are other Christian religions. Such as Mormons. Jehovahs witness. Catholicism. Lutheran. An a whole bunch of others. Good question man
. k w/a k
cheerglitter Christians also believe in Mary, but the difference Christians worship Jesus Christ, whereas Catholics worship Mary.
I know Mary, Jesus Christs earthly Mother, is blessed above all women on earth because she was given a great honor to be the Mother of Jesus, but this does not make her “the Mother of God.” I just wanted to point this out.
The Bible teaches us (54 verses) that when we die we “sleep” and “know nothing” until the Lord calls us from our dusty graves when He returns to take His people home…Mary was human just like me and you. . . She sleeps awaiting the wake up call from Jesus.
aarthur lets move this to the Fun mail. ok with you? :)
catholics believe in pergatory and christians dont for all I know
Wow, some great stuff posted here summarizing church history. Thanks especially to filletofspam and aarthur001 for your insight!
maybe we can compare it with a pizza…the whole pizza is Christianity while a slice of it is Catholicism
All the difference in the world.
wow.
Catholics are Christians. There are several differences however. For example, we believe in the Mother Mary.
wow, indeed.
predondarkness…WOW! I can see that you’ve done your homework! And you know your Bible.
Catholicsim is the only satanic CULT whose members spend time watching for bodily excrements to OOooze from the orfices of the pagan idols they serve
1633 Galileo discovered Mts. on the Moon and earth revolving around the Sun. WAS TRIED & convicted by the CATHOLIC CHURCH Inquisition for affirming a compatibility between science and the Bible
Galileo WAS PLACED ON trial by the CATHOLIC CHURCH Inquisition & found guilty of EVIL heresy & sentenced him to prison, FOR HIS remaining LIFE
Ever since, Catholic writers have told lies about him, and try to justify what happened
Bruno, Giordano (1548. ANOTHER GREAT scientist, the CATHOLIC church burnt HIM ALIVE at the stake..he wrote Of UnitS, Quantity, ShapeS,Images, & Ideas AS Immense & Innumerable
Nicolas Copernicus (1473 Founder of modern astronomy HIS GREAT BOOK De Revolutionibus WAS BANNED BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
1400 AD,,, Pope Boniface VIII issued a decree forbidding the dissection of human corpses for anatomical study AND SCIENCE.
Andreas Vesalius, WROTE A GREAT book of 1543, On Structures of the Human Body, provided the first reliable information on human anatomy ever compiled. he was persecuted by THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HE wandered RUNNING from country FOR HIS LIFE
The idea that the earth goes round the sun was explicitly prohibited in the church’s Index of banned books.. the Copernican theory remained on the Index until 1835. The Catholic cult now believes that the earth may in fact go round the sun
The cat holic list of forbidden books adopted at the 5 th Lateran Council 1515, confirmed by the Council of Trent in 1546. The first edition of the Index Librorum Prohibitorum, Index Librorum Prohibitorum published by Pope Paul I’ve. The 32nd edition, published also in 1948 included 4000 titles. The Index was suppressed in 1966.
Joseph Addison 1719) Great writer of books SUCH AS “Tragedy” Based on Freedom & government responsibility. Individual liberty vs. government tyranny..HIS GREAT BOOKS BANNED by the cat holic church AS EVIL & WICKED.
Francis Bacon 1561 Known as a catalyst of the scientific revolution.
CATHOLIC Book burnings OF Bibles were common IN 1521. Translators and publishers themselves were also burned. Possession of Bibles became criminal offenses & execution of the accused.
The Geneva Bible 1560 WAS BANNED & outlawed BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. Visit http://www.greatsite.com/ TODAY to buy an original TRANSLATION of the GREAT Geneva Bible..THE WORD OF GOD
The Bishops Bible (1568… GODS WORD WAS BURNED & OUTLAWED BY THE CATHOLIC church study here http://www.studylight.org/info/copyright/bible/bis.html
Douai Reams Bible (1582 the 1 st ENGLISH CATHOLIC BIBLE…ROME REFUSED to put a bible into the English bible for nearly 2000 years…FINALLY ROME LOST all POWER OVER ENGLAND…Rome had no choice but to produce her own English version.
ROMES BIBLE is nealy IDENTICAL TO the KJV. BUT ROME claimed THE KJV was error…the Douai Reams BIBLE HAS DELETION OF EVERY instance comanding NOT TO bow to images…ROME DELETED THESE IN ITS TRANSLATION…
Catholic Pope had William Tyndale strangled and burnt at the stake beacuse he translated the Bible into the English
William Tyndale TRANSLATED THE 1 ST…ENGLISH BIBLE. HE was HUNTED DOWN BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. CATHOLIC Cardinal Wolsey arrested, spent over a year in jail, then strangled & burned at the stake
1525: Six thousand copies of William Tyndale’s English bible translation of New Testament were printed in Germany, & smuggled into England—& then burned by the CATHOLIC CHURCH
Girolamo Savonarola cried for Florence to burn thousands of pagan books, filthy pictures, lewd literature, dice, playing cards, etc HE WAS viciously persecuted, tried, tortured, and sentenced to death by papal commissioners
POPE Borgia FAILED TO to “buy”/ BRIBE Savonarola by making him a Cardinal. Savonarola refused the bribe… POPE Borgia got Franciscan monks to speak out against Savonarola then excommunicate & arrested him. He was tortured and put to death by burning.
Thomas Cranmer burned / TORTURED BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH in England UNDER THE POPES COMMAND…FOR preaching the truth see a historical DOC…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXCDD0UJv3s
Gods servant Jan Hus preached against Pope John XXII sale of indulgences for a certain sum of $$$ all sin was forgiven the catholic could buy himself an after-life in Paradise instead of in hell. HE”was imprisoned & burned alive at the stake by the roman cat holic church
1555 GODS SERVANT John Hooper was martyred for the faith OF GOD by THE POPES’Bloody Mary.’The story of his life is told here: http://protestant-truth.org/magazine/article9.htm
THE Vat~ican’s list of forbidden texts are NOW UNDERGOING A new Batch / & A new VAT of APOLOGIES…ROME & Catholicism stay CENTURIES right behind the mobs of IGGY~NORANT / RAKING in your WEALTH.
1633 Galileo discovered Mts. on the Moon and earth revolving around the Sun. WAS TRIED & convicted by the CATHOLIC CHURCH Inquisition for affirming a compatibility between science & the Bible
Galileo WAS PLACED ON trial by the CATHOLIC CHURCH Inquisition & found guilty of EVIL heresy & sentenced to LIFE in prison
Ever since, Catholic writers have told lies about him, & tried to justify what happened
Bruno, Giordano (1548. ANOTHER GREAT scientist~The CATHOLIC church burnt HIM ALIVE at the stake..He wrote Of UnitS, Quantity, ShapeS,Images, & Ideas AS Innumerable / A demonic priest offered To Bruno a Worthless crucifix THROUGH THE FLAMES~ Bruno thrust it away SCREAMING IN AGONY / The pope { in a fit of demonic rage ] had his bones dug up & burned
Catholic Encyclopaedia describes Bruno’s attitude& religion AS A a rationalist”. but NEVER mentionS~ fact—that the Catholic church burnt him alive FOR Not being catholic.
Nicolas Copernicus (1473 Founder of modern astronomy HIS GREAT BOOK De Revolutionibus WAS BANNED BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
1400 AD,,, Pope Boniface VIII issued a decree forbidding the dissection of human corpses for anatomical study & SCIENCE.
Andreas Vesalius, WROTE A GREAT book of 1543, On Structures of the Human Body, provided the first reliable information on human anatomy ever compiled. he was persecuted by THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HE wandered RUNNING from country FOR HIS LIFE
The idea that the earth goes round the sun was explicitly prohibited in the church’s Index of banned books.. the Copernican theory remained on the Index until 1835.
Satans Catholic cult NOW believes that the earth MAY in fact go round the sun { IF THEY CAN GET A POPE, PRIEST, ITALLIAN OR CATHOLIC SHUTTLE TO THE MOON. THEY COULD SELL $$$ SOME MARY MOON DUST.. { CATHOLICS & PAGANS WOULD JUST DIE FOR IT. }
The cat holic list of forbidden books adopted at 5 th Lateran Council 1515, confirmed by the Council of Trent 1546. 1st edition of the Index Librorum Prohibitorum, Index Librorum Prohibitorum published by Pope Paul I’ve. 32nd edition, published also in 1948 included 4000 titles. The Index was suppressed / IGGY }~in 1966.
SADLY FOR SATAN & ROME~~GODS… Bible TRANSLATIONS where printed faster than THEY & their authors – Could be BURNED / murdered.
Joseph Addison 1719) Great writer of books SUCH AS “Tragedy” Based on Freedom & government responsibility. Individual liberty vs. government tyranny..HIS GREAT BOOKS BANNED by the cat holic church AS EVIL & WICKED.
Francis Bacon 1561 Known as a catalyst of the scientific revolution. HIS GREAT BOOKS BANNED by the cat holic church AS EVIL & WICKED.
CATHOLIC burnings OF Bibles were common IN 1521. Translators & publishers themselves were also burned. Possession of Bibles became criminal offenses & execution of the accused.
ROMAN~TIC… !…~iggy~norant Catholic ^RE~VOMITS~~{That Satan & hiS Catholic Church JUSTifiCATION OF burning Bibles & MURDERING / burning their authors HAS BEEN Completly EXxPOSED as PURE LIE & EVIL SATAN INSPIRED
The Geneva Bible 1560 WAS BANNED & outlawed BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. Visit http://www.greatsite.com/ TODAY to buy an original TRANSLATION of the GREAT Geneva Bible..THE WORD OF GOD The ISBN is 0-8298-0789-6
The Bishops Bible (1568… GODS WORD WAS BURNED & OUTLAWED BY THE CATHOLIC church study here TRUE to The original text. THAT ROME BANNEDhttp://www.studylight.org/info/copyright/bible/bis.html
Douai Reams Bible (1582 the 1st ENGLISH CATHOLIC BIBLE…ROME REFUSED to put a bible into the English bible for nearly 2000 years…FINALLY ROME LOST all POWER OVER ENGLAND…Rome had no choice but to produce her own English version.
ROMES BIBLE is nealy IDENTICAL TO the KJV. BUT ROME claimed THE KJV was error…the Douai Reams BIBLE HAS DELETION OF EVERY instance comanding NOT TO bow to images…ROME DELETED THESE IN ITS TRANSLATION…
Catholic Pope had William Tyndale strangled & burnt at the stake beacuse he translated the Bible into the English Oct/6/1536
William Tyndale TRANSLATED THE 1 st. ENGLISH BIBLE. HE was HUNTED DOWN BY the CATHOLIC CHURCH. arrested by romes CATHOLIC Cardinal Wolsey ~ spent over a year in jail, strangled & burned at the stake / BUY Tyndale’s Bible David Daniell & Yale University Press ISBN # is 0-300-04419-4 TRUE to The original text. THAT ROME BANNED http://wesley.nnu.edu/biblical_studies/tyndale/
1525: Six thousand copies of William Tyndale’s English bible translation of New Testament were printed in Germany, & smuggled into England—& then burned by the CATHOLIC CHURCH
Girolamo Savonarola cried for Florence to burn thousands of pagan books, filthy pictures, lewd literature, dice, playing cards, etc HE WAS viciously persecuted, tried, tortured, & sentenced to death by papal commissioners
POPE Borgia FAILED TO to “buy”/ BRIBE Savonarola by making him a Cardinal. Savonarola refused the bribe… POPE Borgia got Franciscan monks to speak out against Savonarola then excommunicate & arrested him. He was tortured & put to death by burning.
Thomas Cranmer burned / TORTURED BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH in England UNDER THE POPES COMMAND…FOR preaching the truth see a historical DOC…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXCDD0UJv3s
Gods servant Jan Hus preached against Pope John XXII sale of indulgences for a certain sum of $$$ all sin was forgiven the catholic could buy himself an after-life in Paradise instead of in hell. HE”was imprisoned & burned alive at the stake by the roman cat holic church
1555 GODS SERVANT John Hooper was martyred for the faith OF GOD by THE POPES’ Bloody Mary.’The story of his life is told here: http://protestant-truth.org/magazine/article9.htm
Thank You Filetofspam for giving us a history lesson. I really appreciate it.
Orion, I would be fine with moving this discussion to funmail, (although I will be leaving for the summer shortly).
There are just a few things that I think need to be clarified before we do so.
I apologize for not including the citation for the quotation, “we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses.” It is Hebrews 12:1 (That’s why I said, “St. Paul”)
You confused me in your last post with all the “you said…I said.” When you said “I said,” it seemed like you were trying to refer to things that you had already previously posted, but I couldn’t find them in your original posts. Did you mean to say “I say”? Also, in at least one of those “I said” sections, you quoted things that I had said, as if they were exactly what you had said. (my point is this: the use of the terms “you said… I said, we extermely confusing.)
Also I wish to clarify my point at the end about the fall and the redemption: Satan’s temptation to man was to “eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.” The Church has always understood that to mean that the Original Sin was a decision on the part of our first parents to decide for themselves, subjectively and arbitrarily, what is good and what is evil without reference to the instuctions of God their Father and creator.
In making this decision, mankind usurped the role of God in deciding good from evil and visa versa, in an attempt to become “like gods” be disobeying God.
The result of this original sin is “to die by death.” Mankind suffered both physical and spiritual death. By the grace of God, we have the opportunity to be brought into new life by the power of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. He is the conqueror of both the physical and the spritual death.
Through Christ, we have the opportunity to become “sons of God,” “coheirs with Christ,” and Partakers of the divine nature (2 Pet 1:4; Gal 4:4-7). When the devil tempted our parents, he said that we would “be like gods” by disobeying God. By contrast, God gives us the opportunity to be the perfect reflection of Christ (God incarnate) by joining ourselves to Christ, and “his body, which is the Church” (see Eph. chapters 4-5; also Col 1:24).
There is a distinction to be made between the souls of those who have died in Christ (those who have “fallen asleep”) and those who have died without repentence (the “damned”).
All humanity is subject to the physical death (except those that live until the last judgement). As such, all who have died the physical death (including Moses) can be (and have been) refered to as “the dead.” However, there are those who have fallen asleep in Christ fall into a different category. Moses is one of these (who was conversing with Christ at the transfiguration before the dead came “out of the tombs after his resurrection they went into the Holy City and appeared to many’ (Mt. 27:52-53).
I submit that there are two categories of “dead”: everyone who has suffered the physical death, and those who are damned. There is a reason why I make this distinction. The Old Testament law clearly forbids communication with the dead. It also clearly depicts the death of Moses. Therefore, if this distinction did not exist, then Christ Jesus would have been guilty of violating the Old Testament law by communicating with Moses at the Transfiguration.
I do not think that Christ violated the law in this case, because Moses was not one of the damned. His spiritual state was such that he would rise from the dead at the resurrection. Thus, Jesus could speak with him without violating the Law. He was dead insofar as he had suffered the physical death. However, he was the sort of person Christ was talking about when he told the Saducees that God said, “I Am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, he is not God of the dead, but of the living” (Mt. 22:32).
In answer to the question asked: “If you say the dead are already in heaven then how can you also think they’ll be raised from the grave at Jesus’ coming? Does God shoot them back down into their graves and raise them at His coming?”
I profess, along with the Church, that the souls (the soul = the intellect + the will) of those who have died are united to God, in the Holy Spirit, through His Son Christ Jesus. As such, they have the ability to converse with God (in other words, they can pray for us just like people on earth pray for us).
At the same time, I profess that their bodies are dead. They are buried in the ground, and they will rise on the last day.
This is a very metaphysically loaded topic. For further reading, I suggest the first part of the “Summa Theologicae” by St. Thomas Aquinas. He wrote extensively about the nature of mankind. Some of the major points relevant to this discussion are: the soul is distinct from the body; the intellect is something that is part of the soul rather than part of the body; man is a body/soul composite rather than a “ghost in a machine”; etc..
The book of Eccelsiastes: This particular Old Testament book asserts many things. Among them is: “I have seen everything that is done under the sun; and behold, all is vanity and a striving after wind” (Ecc 1:14). The author repeats this phrase about seven billion times in that book. The book’s basic point is that all of life is meaningless. However, I think that this book needs to be seen differently in the light of the revelation of God through Christ. Many of the claims that Qoheleth makes could even be read, “this is how it would be if there was no such person as Christ Jesus.”
Spritualism: Ther are several definitios of the term “Spiritualism”. One of them is the attempted control or reliance on the Spirits of the dead, which was described above. Another is the belief the Physical world is evil, and only the spiritual world is good (This is also called “manecheanism” and the Church condemned it as a heresy in the middle ages.) Originally, I had though that the poster was refering to this form of spiritualism. It appears that I was mistaken.
I agree that the phenomenon described above could be considered spiritualism, and it is most certaintly illict. (As a matter of fact, the Church offically condemns the practice of communicating with the dead as described above. See “The Catechism of the Catholic Church” (CCC) paragraphs 2115-2117).
That said, the Church’s belief in the communion of saints is not the same as spiritualism described above. The communion of saints consists of those souls who have died (physically) in Christ, and are alive to God (see Mt. 22:32; Heb. 12:1). They have the ability to pray to God, and God listens to their prayers because they are righteous, and “the prayer of the righteous man has power in its effects (James 5:16). All their prayers are directed towards Christ Jesus, because they are members of the Church, which is his body, and he is their head.
It is possible that the dead may appear to people, as they did after the resurrection (as described in Matthew 27:52-53). However, we must discern such experiences prayerfully. It is entirely possible that these may be deceptions of the devil (as noted above). The Church’s official position on these occurances is that they may occur, but they are not binding (meaning we don’t have to accept them) except for the people to whom they occur. Other people may believe in them, but they are not required to do so. They fall under the category of “private revelation.” All “public revelation” ended with the death of John the Evangelist, and “no new public revelation is to be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ” (“Dei Verbum” 4; CCC 66).
I would be glad to move future discussions to funmail, but I will continue to respond to postings of this thread if they arise.
glynescampbellgreeneyes, I take it that you are a seventh day adventist. You raised several issues in your post that I will try to address.
First, “The Catholic system was founded by the Roman Emporer Constantine, AD 321.”
If you read the letters of the first Christians after the Apostles, you will find that that is not so. St. Ignatius of Antioch wrote circa 105 AD that were you find acts of charity “there you find the Catholic Church”. From the earliest days, the Church employed what is knows as the “Apostle’s Creed” as the profession of faith at baptism. It uses the phrase “I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, [etc.]”
As far as the celebration of the sabbath on Sunday, there are several early references for that. First is the “didache” which was a guide for liturgical celebration in the early Church. It was written in the 1st century AD. Also there was a letter written by the Roman centurian Pleny in 112 AD. In that letter, he told his superiors about Christians who gathered “on the first day of the week and sing hymns to Christ as to a God” We do not worship the sun-god by changing the sabbath. We worship Christ by celbrating the day of his resurrection.
Next: The “second” commandment.
It is true that God told man not to make any graven image or to bow down and worship them. However, immediately following that passage in Exodus, God commanded the Israelites to construct the Ark of the Covenant which was marked by two “cherebim” or angels that had faces of men. Later on, when King Solomon built the temple, there were two giant Cherebim in the holy of holies, where the priest would bow every year on the day of atonement asking for the forgiveness of the peoples sins.
God forbade the construction of idols for the purpose of worshipping idols. He did not forbid the construction of statue-like figures for the purpose of worshipping the one-true-God. In fact, he mandated that they do exactly that.
How do modern-day Catholic statues relate to that commandment? Today, we use statues of Mary and the other saints much like people use pictures of their mother or their friends who have died. It is a reminder to us that we are not alone. We believe that those who have died are “alive in Christ”. Like the angels, they constantly behold the face of God, and have the ability to pray for us more perfectly than we can pray for ourselves.
It is true that those statues cannot pray for us, nor can they acknowledge our prayers or requests in any way. However, the people of whom the statues were meant to remind us can pray for us. The statue is just the reminder. We do not worship these people, but we do honor them as the holy men and women of God. They are the “great cloud of witnesses” that St. Paul describes in the letter to the Hebrews (Heb. 11:1-12:1).
Worhiping the Pope: We do not worship the pope. We honor him as the successor to St. Peter and the “keeper of the keys” (Mt. 16:19). It is not required that anyone bow down to the pope, although it is a measure of respect, just as the Israelites would bow to the king of Israel and the ancient and medeval peoples would bow to forgeign dignitaries out of respect for them and their office.
Finally: Honor the Sabbath day and keep it holy. Amen to that I say. We do celebrate the Sabbath day, as the Church has celebrated it since the first century: on the First day of the Week. Also, take the following into account: “man was not made for the sabbath, but the sabath for man” (Mark 2:27). We try to honor the Lord’s Day, but sometimes we fall short. We do believe that the Son of Man is Lord even of the sabbath (see mark 2:28).
aarthur said:
I am familiar with the bible referring to the dead as ‘those who have fallen asleep,’ but I have not seen those portions saying that the dead ‘know nothing.’ In any case, we still hold that those who have fallen asleep in Christ are not truly dead, but are alive in Christ. Jesus refers to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as ‘living, because all live to him’ (Lk. 20:38).
I said:
Ecclesiastes 9:5-6, 10, NIV. “For the living know that they will die, but THE DEAD KNOW NOTHING; they have no further reward, and even the memory of them is forgotten. Their love, their hate and their jealousy have long since vanished; never again will they have a part in anything that happens under the sun… Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might, for in the grave, where you are going, there is neither working nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom.”
You said: When Christ died on the cross, ‘the tombs also were opened, and… saints who had fallen asleep were raised, and coming out of the tombs after his resurrection they went into the Holy City and appeared to many’ (Mt. 27:52-53 note the use of the past tense). When St. Paul (Saint Paul? ) described the Old Testament saints, he said: ‘Since we are surrounded by a such a great cloud of witnesses…’ (12:1)? (Where is this verse? It’s not Mt. 12:1) The only reason that the saints can be said to be living is because of the power of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.
You asked: Where in the Bible does it say that only those saints who are mentioned in the Bible are in heaven?
I said: The Bible covers hundreds of years which was enough time to mention all who might have been taken to heaven. But only those of the Bible were mentioned and no more, which means no one else was raised from the dead and translated to heaven otherwise it would be documented in the Bible.
You said: In the Old Testament, Elijah is portrayed as being taken up in chariots of fire, but Moses dies. However, at the transfiguration, Jesus converses with both Moses and Elijah.
I said: When Jesus died some of the dead saints were raised up and entered the city and appeared to many. Those who were raised were probably great men of faith like Moses. It stands to reason that he was one of them. Therefore, it is no surprise that Moses was with Elijah while talking with Jesus at the transfiguration.
You said: When Jesus tells the story about the rich man and Lazarus, he depicts Abraham as being in heaven (in fact, the Jews have referred to heaven as ‘the bosom of Abraham’). Abraman converses with the rich man about the possible conversion of his friends and relatives on earth Lk. 16:22-31).
I said: The rich man and Lazarus is a parable. A parable is a short fictitious story that illustrates a moral attitude or a religious principle.
In Luke 16:23 talks about a rich man being in Hades (Hell). If you believe as I, which you’ve already said you did, then the dead do not ascend to heaven or descend into hell upon their death, but “sleep” in the grave until Jesus returns. This points to it being a parable.
Also, do you honestly think someone in hell can see and talk to someone in heaven? I sure hope not. I would not like to think of a loved one being able to see the saints having a wonderful time in heaven while they are being tormented by the flames of hell fire. This also points to it being a parable.
What about the part where it talks about how the rich man asks Abraham to send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool his tongue; do you really think one tiny little drop of water would even make it to his tongue without be instantly evaporated? And what would one tiny drop of water do to help cool his tongue in hell? It’s a parable . . . .
You said: The Catholic Church does teach that the souls of the dead are in heaven, but it is not spiritualism . The Church also strongly affirms the belief in the resurrection of the dead. We don’t believe that the body is bad. On the contrary, we believe that the body and the soul will be raised on the last day.
I said: You confused me on this one. You said the RCC teaches that the souls of the dead are in heaven, but then you say that at the resurrection of the dead…(the body and the soul) will be raised from the dead on the last day, which I am taking to mean the second coming of Jesus when the graves will open and the dead shall rise…If you say the dead are already in heaven then how can you also think they’ll be raised from the grave at Jesus’ coming? Does God shoot them back down into their graves and raise them at His coming? Please, help me out here.
You said: The quote from the Book of Genesis is usually rendered in english bibles as ‘In the day that you eat of it [the fruit of the tree] you shall die’ (Gen 2:17). However when the verse is rendered in Hebrew, it actually contains a double ‘death’; it could either be understood ‘by death you shall die’ or ‘you shall die the death’ The death that mankind endures because of the sin of Adam is a physical and a spiritual death, but in Christ, we have the ability to conquer both the physical and the spiritual. Since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead; just as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
I said: I have no complaints with your statement; “because of the sin of Adam is a physical and a spiritual death, but in Christ, we have the ability to conquer both…” This was not the point I was making though.
God said that ‘in the day ye shall eat of the fruit of the tree ye shall surely die’. But Satan said ‘ye shall not surely die but be as gods’ Satan has always told us that we will never die and that God is evil and he is good. Satan has always told us that we’d live forever if we do as he says; ‘eat the fruit and be as gods’.
God teaches us that when we die we “sleep” and “know nothing”. Satan tells us that ‘ye shall never die’ and to prove he is right, Satan makes us believe that the dead are lonely spirits who want to send a message, or come to a loved one. When in all actuality it is one of Satan’s evil angels masquerading as a dead loved one. This is called spiritualism; the teaching that the dead are not “sleeping” in the graves, but elsewhere.
orion, I would love an answer. it is an interesting observation. what did glynescampbellgreeneyes say that made you think she was jewish? I didn’t see anything in her answer that indicated that.
glynescampbellgreeneyes is of Jewish belief. I recognized several of their beliefs in what glynesc said.
I followed along and understood what glynesc said, but I believe a few points were wrong, but the majority is correct (without the anger).
Most Catholics don’t know that the pope and Emperor Constantine changed the true Sabbath, the 7th day of the week, Saturday to Sunday the first day of the week, but it is very well documented by the Catholics themselves. They do not try to hide it at all. As a matter of fact there are many quotes in different books saying so, even in their own catechism .
You are correct glynesc when you said that there is no text in the entire Bible that states that the true Sabbath, Saturday was ever changed. The Catholics say the reason they changed it to Sunday was because Jesus rose from the dead on that day, but Jesus Himself never kept Sunday, but Saturday as the holy Sabbath .
God wrote the Ten Commandments with His own finger in tablets of stone. He gave them to Moses to give to his people, but Moses broke them in a fit of anger when he saw what his people had become.
God wrote the Ten Commandments again with His finger in tables of stone. The Ten Commandments were so important that God Himself wrote them in stone with His finger! And the fourth Commandments is “Remember the Sabbath to keep it holy…” Isn’t it funny, that the only Commandments that starts with “Remember” is the only one that is not kept by all today?
The Catholic Church does, I believe, worship Mary. Even in their churches there are paintings and carvings of Mary being worshipped. There is one painting I saw with Mary being crowned by Jesus and God making her above Jesus as “the Mother of God”
aarthur wrote:
As far as the celebration of the Sabbath on Sunday, there are several early references for that. First is the ‘didache’ which was a guide for liturgical celebration in the early Church. It was written in the 1st century AD. Also there was a letter written by the Roman centurian Pleny in 112 AD. In that letter, he told his superiors about Christians who gathered ‘on the first day of the week and sing hymns to Christ as to a God’
I hate to call him a liar, but what he has said here is false. If you are going to say something like that you really need to post your references to prove your point, otherwise you’ve just made up a story to fit your purpose.
History books prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the pope together with Emperor Constantine changed the true Sabbath to Sunday because the pagans worshipped the sun god and the RCC desired to separate themselves from the Jewish leaders.
Before this time never had a Christian ever worshipped on any other day except the true Sabbath, Saturday. From Adam down thru time to Christ’s age and the Bible nothing was changed except what the Catholics did themselves. The pope put himself above God by changing the holy Sabbath from Saturday to a pagan worship day, Sunday. Jesus would have told us if He wanted to honor His resurrection by changing the day, but He did not.
The RCC also changed God’s Ten Commandments to suit them as well. Take a good look at the Holy Bible, say a King James Version. Read the Commandments in Exodus then look at the Catholic Bible. You will be very surprised at what you find.
God is our Creator. He is whom we love and worship, not the RCC, but the RCC has kicked God’s Ten Commandments to the side and replaced them with their own commandments! The RCC pope actually says he is “God on earth”! This is blaspheme! And the followers actually go ahead and deify him! There is only ONE God and it is not the RCC. Wake up people before it’s too late.
There are many, many differences between Catholics and Christians. I could go on, but I think I have said enough to get you thinking. Do not let man tell you what to believe. Study for yourself.
-
What makes Catholicism and Christianity different? - 14 Answers
Is it beliefs, rituals, basically why are they two seperate branches of christianity?
-
Whats the difference between christianity and catholicism? - 5 Answers
Pleaaase answer...whats the difference between christian and catholicism???
-
What is the difference between a Messianic Christian and a - 5 Answers
What is the difference between a Messianic Christian and a Messianic Jew?
-
How many different religions believe in the true presence of - 2 Answers
How many different religions believe in the true presence of christ in communion?
-
Mandy, are you Christian? - 2 Answers
Hey Mandy... I was just wondering...are you a christian??
-
How are Christian and Jewish beliefs different? - 6 Answers
I'm Christian, and my friend is Jewish. He told me the only difference between the two is that they don't believe Christ is o...
-
What is the difference between Jewish people and Christians? - 9 Answers
My teacher is Jewish but I thought Jews believe in God so why aren't they called Christians? And why when you look back in hi...
-
What is the difference between Catholic and Christian? - 19 Answers
I'm always wondering what is the difference between catholic and christianity. I know that catholic churches have a priest a...
-
Is flyleaf under the category of christian? - 2 Answers
In a few months im going to the christian rehab thing and I can only bring christian cds... Isnt flyleaf considered christian?
-
Why do so many judeo christian religions have different bibles? - 11 Answers
Right or wrong, I consider myself reasonably well versed in a number of religious topics. From the Council of Carthage where ...
Religion, Spirituality & Folk...
Christianity, Islam, Buddhism
Type Calendar
Holiday Calendar, Event Planning, Time and Date
Law for Life
Legal Services, Christian Faith, Blog
The Bible Unveiled
Religion, Christianity, Truth
Walk and Talk
Life Coaching, Christian Counseling, Personal Development
Squeeze & Pray
Online Retail, E-commerce, Internet Shopping