Categories
- Beauty & Style
- Computers & Tech
- Education & School
- Entertainment
- Environmental Issues
- Food & Dining
- FunAdvice Community
- Gaming & Games
- General Knowledge
- Health
- Home & Garden
- Jobs & Money
- Kids
- Love & Relationships
- Music
- Nutrition & Fitness
- Parents & Family
- Pets & Animals
- Politics
- Religion & Spirituality
- Science
- Shopping
- Sports
- Travel
- Writing & Literature
in my opinion, he didn't bring it up because then he would be forced to acknowledge that the whole thing is just a dirty tricks smear.
And the head guy can never admit to doing those things. He has to leave it to underlings so that he can maintain deniability.
POSSIBLY after they think enough damage has been done, the McCain camp will become very self righteous about it and promise to track down those evil doers - but in fact nothing will be done.
phrannie, Obama is light years ahead of McCain on the issue of economics.
Yes amblessed, there is another debate, but it is a lose/lose situation for McCain. If he doesn't bring it up, the wing nuts will go balitsic, and if he does, it will clearly show he is desperate and is willing to throw any smear or lie out there in order to win.



Why didn't mccain bring up ayers at the debate?
If, as McCain/Palin have been saying on the stump, Obama has this close connection to former domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, and it is something that we need to be really concerned about, why didn't he bring it up during the debate? It is not something...
new that just came up. It came up during the primary.
Why would he not confront Obama directly when he had the chance?