Welcome!


Join more than 151,000 members on FunAdvice to ask questions, share advice, photos and make new friends today.
FunAdvice RSS for this page:
Rss_feed

Which party would benefit ?

Asked by amblessed about 1 year ago, 5 answers.

1/30/08: Ralph Nader has formed a presidential exploratory committee, and said in an interview Wednesday that he will launch another presidential bid if he's convinced he can raise enough money to appear on the vast majority of state ballots this fall -...

Which party would benefit ?

favorite girl Answered by piker187 on Jan 30, 2008, 01:37PM
989 answers

neither, this election is going to be so messed up im voting for an independant

Whiteboard portrate Answered by filletofspam on Jan 30, 2008, 02:14PM
2972 answers
Advisor-small

Certainly Nader running will benefit the Republican party.

Not sure how large the effect will be. Many of the people who will vote for Nader wouldn't vote if there were no truely progressive candidates on the ballot. Also, a lot of Democrats are mad at Nader for being a spoiler in the past.

If we have a close race even a small effect could sway the national election. Look at our 2000 election. Even a few hundred votes could have changed the outcome.

Shark Atack Answered by funadvice on Jan 30, 2008, 02:23PM
53963 answers

I never bought the arguement that Nader cost the Democrats the presidential election in 2000 and 2004, or that he was even a factor. Not all of his supporters were disillusioned Democrats; many were simply independents disgusted with both parties (as was Nader himself). Many of his policies ran seriously against the Democrat party line. I really doubt ALL the Nader voters in Florida and New Hampshire would have voted for Gore or Kerry.

However, I do think that if Nader was allowed to participate in televised debates, his numbers would soar, or at least greatly exceed what he's gotten before. But neither party would ever let this happen.

Whiteboard portrate Answered by filletofspam on Jan 31, 2008, 08:02AM
2972 answers
Advisor-small

I have to agree that Republican dirty tricks and even the confusing butterfly balots in Florida had more to do with deciding the 2000 election than Nader's candidicy.

Consider that out of the millions of Florida votes the election was decided by a few hundred votes. When things are that close it takes very little to sway the election.

I believe that Nader wants to be the spoiler. He wants the Democratic party to continue to loose until it changes. I agree that the Democratic party needs to change but the amount of harm that another 4 years of Republican rule could do to America could take decades to undo, especially if he stacks the Supreme Court with right wing nut jobs who will serve until they die.

Answered by zmarsh on Jan 31, 2008, 09:42PM
106 answers

What do you believe is wrong with republican rule?

Neither party would benefit.

Answer this Question: "Which party would benefit ?"

Your Answer: HTML is not allowed.



Politics Photos

party,party,party,let all  get  wasted!  party picbra & panties party

Share this question

Copy and paste this code:
It will display on your blog or site like this:
Which party would benefit ?