Welcome!


Join more than 151,000 members on FunAdvice to ask questions, share advice, photos and make new friends today.
FunAdvice RSS for this page:
Rss_feed

The death penalty for child molesters/rapists?

new photo Asked by angelbabe415 about 1 year ago, 16 answers.

The supreme court ruled that a person may not be put to death for raping an adult, however, in 5 states, a child rapist may be put to death if found guilty. Since this is a far worse crime for the victim than a murder, beause the child will have to live...

with this for the rest of their lives, should a possible penalty be death?

twilight Answered by miscegenymiser on Oct 31, 2008, 10:13AM
519 answers

Here's something for consideration. If a molester knows that the penalty for raping a child is the same as that of killing a child... will he rationalize that leaving a witness that can identify him is more of a gamble?

I think that the only redeeming quality of capital punishment is the determent factor it brings. We can argue the devastating effects of rape and abuse and how they impact the futures of the victims... but we can't argue the finality of death. A dead victim has no future.

I personally think that there are times in life when the fear of reprisal is the only motivation for the return to sanity. Unfortunately. This most severe punishment should only be instituted for the most severe crime.

I would prefer for my child to have a victim's future as opposed to none at all.

1 person thought this was helpful
lollll! Answered by katieliddle233 on Oct 31, 2008, 04:38AM
169 answers

I don't think the death penalty should be used for anything.
I think it's wrong. Think about it - say the courts convicted someone who was actually innocent as guilty and sentenced them to death.

It has happened in the past. It may not be very likely, I don't know, but if there's a chance an innocent life could be taken, it should be abolished.

Answered by seao2florida on Oct 31, 2008, 04:48AM
460 answers

Now that DNA is a tested and proved technique, if there is clear evidence of aggrivated rape, torture, ruling out any possibility of consensual sex, I have no issue with it. The death penalty should only be used in cases where there is overwhelming evidence this was more than a drunken incident or a date rape. Those should be given long sentences, not the death penalty. And for child rapist absolutely. There is no known cure for pedophilia and the damage that is done can be devastating. However, the evidence to support a death sentence should be very strong.

There are instances where the woman has cried wolf. However, there are far more where a rape victim has refused to come forward for a variety of reasons. And until we can truly rehabilitate the perpetrator, there is no reason for your sister, your mother or grandmother for that matter fear being raped by those who will rape again. I don't care that they didn't get the little red bicycle or were abused or raped when they were kids, women now should not have to fear them. I wish we could go back and save these criminals from the conditions which made them who they are, but we don't have time travel yet.

Serial rapists, just like sociopathic serial killers like Cacy, Bundy, Manson, Lucas should be put to death, when the evidence supports it.

2 people thought this was helpful
yupp Answered by fake_fingernails on Oct 31, 2008, 05:57AM
1095 answers

I think they should for child molestors cause the poor child would have to live with that for the rest of her/his life. And as for rapists be if the were sober...cause sometimes drunks have no clue what they're doing..even though it's their fault.
And definately if they could prove it incase the person was innocent.

Face! Answered by underwaterophelia on Oct 31, 2008, 07:05AM
1843 answers
Advisor-small

I don't believe in the death penalty at all.

Answered by fau on Oct 31, 2008, 07:20AM

F*ck them all and then kill them after a shotgun blast to the balls.

Or just spade them that would work too. haha

Three Days Grace Answered by matt18091 on Oct 31, 2008, 07:29AM
629 answers

I agree with wh0deany0fhilari0usness. Cut there balls off and if there caught molesting remove there hands.

How far we have come... Answered by jimahl on Oct 31, 2008, 08:09AM
2603 answers

No one should get the death penalty. It accomplishes nothing.

Toadaly Answered by toadaly on Oct 31, 2008, 09:21AM
4232 answers

I oppose the death penalty not on moral grounds, but on practical grounds. Innocent people do get convicted from time to time, and the death penalty can not be undone.

If we had a perfect trustworthy justice system, I'd be ok with it for some crimes, but it's counterproductive to even discuss which crimes, because to do so detracts from the reality that the justice system is far from perfect.

HJKJ Answered by straightedge on Oct 31, 2008, 09:25AM
77 answers

I personally think death is the easy way out so I think they should just rot in prison until they die. but thats just my opinion.

madd gangsta yo....neon and noodle Answered by vultureofculture on Oct 31, 2008, 09:58AM
1074 answers

I think thats the only way to go until we find a cure for this horrid mental imbalance
sounds old school but what else can we do?
nothing works as of yet

Shark Atack Answered by funadvice on Oct 31, 2008, 01:46PM
53985 answers

people, this world has gone crazy. either way, rape is one of the worst crimes 9besides murder) that anyone could commit. it's actually similar to murder; you're killing the person's self-esteem and happiness. so, I vote yes to death penalty for rape of child and an adult. this world is just so messed up, it makes me sick!

woofstock Answered by utopia on Oct 31, 2008, 06:55PM
1477 answers

I do not believe in the death penalty for any crime.
I do believe in life without parole.

Answered by seao2florida on Nov 02, 2008, 11:42PM
460 answers

***No one should get the death penalty. It accomplishes nothing.***

It stops recidivism. That individual will certainly never commit the crime for which he was punished.

0 people thought this was helpful
How far we have come... Answered by jimahl on Nov 03, 2008, 11:23AM
2603 answers

It stops recidivism. That individual will certainly never commit the crime for which he was punished.

So does life without parole.

0 people thought this was helpful
Answered by seao2florida on Nov 04, 2008, 05:52AM
460 answers

***So does life without parole.***

Except American tax payer monies don't have to pay for his life without parole, and his possibility of escaping and doing it again.

Answer this Question: "The death penalty for child molesters/rapists?"

Your Answer: HTML is not allowed.


Our members said the answers on this page also answer the following questions:


Child molesters death penalty, Death penalty for child molester, Death penalty for child molesters, Should child molester be put to death, Rapist and the death penalty, Innocent people may die if child molesters are sentenced to the death pe, Behind a molester, rapist, Death penalty for date rape, Arguments on why child molesters should get death penalty, Goodspeech in death penalty, Should rapist and molesters be put to death, Whip rapists, More severe penalty for rapist, Should rapist be given the death penalty, Killing a child molester, Rapist and molesters what should be done to them

Politics Photos

If i was death thats how i would wanna lookDeath of SupermanDeaf child area

Share this question

Copy and paste this code:
It will display on your blog or site like this:
The death penalty for child molesters/rapists?