Obama while in the illinois senate voted to with-hold life

It's been acknowledged that Obama while in the Illinois senate voted to with-hold life saving measures to a newly, fully born, viable baby. His reasoning, 'it was originally intended that the baby be aborted' - yet, he in the campaign he stated 'no-one...

is pro abortion' - How does this square ?

What are you trying to argue about?
Or what point are you trying to make?

It wasn't a fully born viable baby. It was a 21 week old fetus. A woman came forth with an agenda she wanted to have approved concerning treatment of fetuses showing some sort of life during botched abortions. 70% of premature babies born to parents don't even survive, so I don't see how treatment of aborted fetuses even at 4 months would do any good. Obama also said passing a law like that would overturn the right for people to have abortions.

When he says no one is pro-abortion he means that people are pro-choice. No one says, I think it's great and we should be allowed to get abortions whenever we want for fun! People just want the right, and believe in the right, to make decisions and choices that are in the best interests for their own bodies.

It's been acknowledged that Obama while in the Illinois senate voted to with-hold life saving measures to a newly, fully born, viable baby.

This is a lie. Obama never voted TO withhold life saving measures. He voted against a bill that was a veiled attempt to make all abortions illegal. He supported the similar federal bill that Bush signed that had protections for Roe v Wade.

Go peddle you right-wing lies elsewhere. This has been thoroughly debunked long ago. But you wingnuts keep rolling it out to see if it will stick. So far it hasn't. Give it up...

Ditto to jimahl...
We have been over this lie from other right wing members time and again...
All those who do their research know the truth...
Obama did NOT vote to withhold life saving measures...

Please, this is boring...
turn on FOX and select a new lie to spread...

Funny no matter how much evidence there is they can never accept it. And there are people who are pro abortion. There is one women who actually does support abortion and her name is Aliza Shvarts who would induce pregnancy as many times as possible and force miscarriages. All for the sake of art and discourse. This isn't about someones right any more, this is all for the sake of art and sparking outrage from the right.

got that one from CNN and NBC, so it must be the truth

Funny no matter how much evidence there is they can never accept it.

You must be looking in a mirror. Where is the evidence that Obama voted FOR not saving the life of a viable baby. Voting against something does not necessariy mean you are voting for the opposite. It means there were things attached to the bill that he couldn't support. Why do you keep overlooking the fact that he supported the bill that was eventually signed by Bush?

And there are people who are pro abortion.

As much as you would like to beleive that, no there aren't...

There is one women who actually does support abortion and her name is Aliza Shvarts who would induce pregnancy as many times as possible and force miscarriages. All for the sake of art and discourse.

Either you are a poor researcher, or you are a liar, or both... That whole incident was a hoax. She never did it. It was a performance art piece in which she claimed to have done that, BUT SHE NEVER DID. Yale released this statement to the press: Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art... Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials. She stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages. The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body.

Get a clue...

its in the senate record.