Answer this Question: "Is Star Trek 3000 years too advanced?"
Popular questions related to Is Star Trek 3000 years too advanced?
- Who invented the microwave oven?
- What is the difference between a robot and an android?
- What's a light year?
- Tell me formula of one light year in kilometers
- How to explain this petrified wood?
- Why was pluto reconsidered as a planet?
- How much would it cost to go to the moon?
- 62,000 mile high space elevator operational by 2018?
- does the mayan calendar end on the year 2012
- What makes a star glow???
- Are we not advanced enough to perceive alien life?
- Green, orange, blue, or red strars, what are they?
- Flourecent Bulb
- how can I make my breast small?
- How many light years away is the center of the milkyway?
- If theres God, why can it all be explained by science?
Share this question
Copy and paste this code:It will display on your blog or site like this:
Is star trek 3000 years too advanced?
 



Is star trek 3000 years too advanced?
Star Trek takes place in the 2200's and in the Star Trek Universe FTL (Faster than Light) speeds were developed in 2062. Star Trek in a Kardashev 2 type civilization. I personally think that light speed won't be possible until atleast 2492. Mankind is...
predicted to become a Kardashev 2 Civilization in the year 5,200 which is about 3000 years after Star Trek takes place. Is Star Trek being unreasonable about their technological feats, so early on? It doesn't seem possible for a civilization that has just discovered space travel to be able to travel Faster than the Speed of Light in only 54 years, or 2062. Star Trek should take place in the 5200's not the 2200's. Any comments or suggestions?