Categories
- Beauty & Style
- Computers & Technology
- Education & School
- Entertainment
- Environmental Issues
- Food & Dining
- FunAdvice Community
- Gaming & Games
- General Knowledge
- Health
- Home and Garden
- Jobs & Money
- Kids
- Love and Relationships
- Music
- Nutrition and Fitness
- Parents & Family
- Pets & Animals
- Politics
- Religion & Spirituality
- Science
- Shopping
- Sports
- Travel
A life without food is worse. Your body needs food to sustain itself... even if it's bad food at least it's SOMETHING.
(that's why on Man vs Wild he like eats nasty stuff. Because without nutrition you die)
xox
Sika
A life without food is rather short? At least fried food would keep you going for longer, and experiencing much of the beauty that exists in this world.
No food = DEATH within a few weeks (at most)
Fried food = Life, but probably shorter and with more health problems than if one ate more healthy.
They're just as bad as each other.
To much fried food is extremely unhealthy, and so is no food. They can both KILL
I would have to say fried food is worse. I haven't touched the stuff in over eight months.
Slow death or quick death? That's your choice.
with food you live
without food you die
so with food is probably much much better.






Which is worse: a life of fried food or a life of no food?
I know random isnt it but I was thinking about it and im curiuos wich is worse for you? a life of fried food or a life without food at all, give me opinions people!!! xxx