Welcome!


Join more than 151,000 members on FunAdvice to ask questions, share advice, photos and make new friends today.
FunAdvice RSS for this page:
Rss_feed

Compassion for a terroist?

Asked by maxyfox 2 months ago, 12 answers.

Abdul Baset Ali al-Megrahi (the Lockerbie bomber) was recently released on grounds of compassion, so that he may return home and die in peace with his family, as he is belived to only have 3 months left to live.

Views?

Toadaly Answered by toadaly on Aug 23, 2009, 09:23PM
4232 answers

They should put him on a remotely controlled plane and get his hopes up of returning home. Then use the plane as a missile to blow up a terrorist training camp.

2 people thought this was helpful
Answered by fau on Aug 23, 2009, 05:14PM

I think it was good for them to let him out for his family's sake
But apparently it was for 20 years or something
So in the little chance he could miraculously recover, he would be free for 20 years
Where he could bomb somewhere again..

But I don't think he will so I guess it was okay for them to let him out.

MrGramophone Answered by mrgramophone on Aug 23, 2009, 05:19PM
109 answers

I don't think it was OK to let him out. I was thinking it was probably to save money -- who knows. Mr. Ronald Biggs was also released on compassionate grounds and was probably released for the same reason. What's the bet both men will probably live for many more years. What's your thinking on this?

Answered by maebee on Aug 23, 2009, 07:21PM
1889 answers

I do not agree with it. I have no compassion for him what-so-ever.

kitty Answered by ty on Aug 23, 2009, 09:34PM
10116 answers
Advisor-small

oh please, the guy was let out based on either political reasons or financial ones, it had nothing to do with compassion. He's going to die and they didnt want to have to pay his final medical expenses. Let it go already...

Answered by maxyfox on Aug 24, 2009, 03:30AM
73 answers

Mrgramophone: My thinking, well the terms for compassionate release is less than 3 months to live, so if he makes it past that, we should re-arrest him... That or send an assassin to kill him, I'm thinking code name: Grim Reaper would be good.

I'd agree TY, Although I don't think it's to save money on medical treatment, because the amount of money this release has cost, you'd never break even, plus we have the NHS over here, so the govoment is used to paying for peoples treatment.

But I wouldn't be shocked if it was entirerly political, does Lybia have oil maybe :P

Moj 'n' me Answered by phrannie on Aug 24, 2009, 05:26AM
4271 answers
Advisor-small

LOL toadaly...sometimes you just crack me up...and I agree!

Ty is right, tho...NO GOVERNMENT ANYWHERE (including our own) does anything in the name compassion...it's always about money, or secret politics...period, end of story.

p

woofstock Answered by utopia on Aug 24, 2009, 07:24AM
1477 answers

ty and phrannie are correct...
this is rooted in something other than compassion...

How far we have come... Answered by jimahl on Aug 24, 2009, 09:32AM
2603 answers

I agree too.

This has to be a first for funadvice. Liberals, libertarians and conservatives all agreeing. Could the be a sign of armageddon?

Milan Answered by ifeelcrazy123 on Aug 24, 2009, 12:20PM
4944 answers
Advisor-small

Agreed with jimahl and the rest.

I think the bigger problem will be if he breeds while out...then he passes on his genes...

woofstock Answered by utopia on Aug 24, 2009, 01:30PM
1477 answers

he has advanced stage prostate cancer...not much chance for that.

Milan Answered by ifeelcrazy123 on Aug 25, 2009, 10:30AM
4944 answers
Advisor-small

oops. my mistake. lol.

Answer this Question: "Compassion for a terroist?"

Your Answer: HTML is not allowed.



Politics Photos

...Back door compass.BAN THE GOLDEN COMPASS

Share this question

Copy and paste this code:
It will display on your blog or site like this:
Compassion for a terroist?