What would you do if hilary became president?

what would you do if hillary became president (like that will ever happen)

I wouldn't support her 100% (I don't support anyone 100%, my support is always conditional).

I would celebrate her winning because I have no doubt that she we would be the best president we had at least since her husband was in office.

I too am amused by randum's Jesus avatar and his threat to break one of the commandments (5th if you are Catholic, 6th if you are Protestant). This brings me to the important question:

Who would Jesus assassinate?

I would support her 100%!!!

She would make a very good president. I agree it probably isn't going to happen.

So you are for assainating a duly elected preseident?

Misogyny is alive a well I see!

You ignorance is overwhelming.

That is a stupid thing to say! Also illegal. People like you randum should be removed from the United States of America and shipped to a country that has no freedoms! That is where you belong. Then we would see if you would make a comment like the one you just made.

You are a hypocrite to have a picture of Jesus as your Avatar!!!

I also think she (Hillary) would do a great job as President. Maybe she would ship people like randun out of the US for a period of 4 years to serve in a place with no Freedom!

dam, come on. Hillary would wreck this country. You cannot put a famale prsident in office during a time of war. Its suicide

"Hillary would wreck this country"

Yeah, we wouldn't want to elect anyone that would wreck this country. We've had a great thing going these last 8 years...wouldn't want to end it by electing someone who would reverse some of the things Bush has done.

*rolls eyes to ensure sarcasm is understood*

In regard to the OP, I'd continue to live my life. The world's not going to end just because Hillary is President.

...some of the comments here are amazing. I've never seen such paranoia.

I'm with jimahl -- I'd support her 100% !

what could you do? lol. my opinion is that she is the best candidate. everyone knows that the president is pretty much just a face anyway. they dont sit around the white house making all the decisions on their own. I dont expect any major changes, no matter who is elected. thats just reality.

She's like every other politician. They all lie their asses off. Generally speaking, Im not saying shes the only one, they all do it. I honestly think Mike Huckabee should win. But thats just my opinion.

I could list all the negatives, but I don't have the time, I need to secure my wallet, and this site doesn't have the space.

Ashyjean, I agree somewhat with your comment that all politicians lie, but so do all people at some point. Some more than others, some a lot more than others. It depends on what you are lying over. I think lying about a sexual daliance is nothing compared liing to people to get them to go to war with a country that did nothing to us and that kills more than 100,000 people. A lie like that is a crime.

And I could never vote for someone who doesn't believe in evolution, like Huckleberry. He thinks the world was created 6,000 years ago.

"dam, come on. Hillary would wreck this country. You cannot put a famale prsident in office during a time of war. Its suicide"

what do you think, that she would be out having her nails done? what a compliment to all women.

I would breathe a sigh of relief that we didn't have another republican in office.
GREAT answer filetofspam!
and maybe if clinton was in office we could begin the painful process of extracting this country from the talons of the right wing, evangelical groups.

ok good point guys, our country is allready in a lot of trouble. And I don't want to see another republican in office either. But we are in war, clinton is not the right choice. and im not bashing women, but I don't feel a girl with no military background of anykind could possibly help in a war when she's in charge. And I f*ckin hate Mccain too, but he;s going to get my vote

What is wrong with Republicans, who has ever gave you so much back on your taxes and is giving you a tax refund this year?

We use to be glad we got a $100.00 back on our taxes now they are giving up to $6,000.00 for a family of 5 that maybe didn't even work all year.

You won't get a Democrat to do that, they are trying to take it back as we speak.

First off Pyker, the republicans got us into this war (at least the Iraq war). It is going to take a democrat to get us out. A vote for McCain is a vote for 100 more years of war. And second, your sexists comments are not welcome in a civil society. As I said on another post:

"misogyny is alive and well I see."

Magichalo, the republicans have given me nothing in tax breaks. Most of them went to the already super-rich. And the minimal tax breaks I got were eaten up in the higher cost of living due to republican economic and trade policies. The dollar is going down the tubes, and the governemnt printing more money that we dont have is only going to make it worse. There is no quick fix, but the first thing we have to do is get a democrat in the WH.

right on, jimahl

magichalo, the Republicans have not actually given us anything. They raided our retirement plans to give us checks by effectively printing money from thin air.

Wealth is not created by the printing press, as much as they would have you believe.

right on, toadaly

I don't understand how you are all buying into the Media crap. The Super Rich did not get all the tax breaks. I have 7 sons and a daughter. They are all married and have children. Since the Republicans have been in office, families are getting back in taxes 3 times more than they did when the democrats were in office. How do I know this. Not just because of my adult children but because my husband has done taxes for years at HR block. This is also the first time in my 56 years that I have heard of young adult single workers getting any money back on taxes. This is also the first time since my children have left home that my husband and I haven't had to pay $2,000. plus in taxes when we already paying out to the hilt in taxes out of our pay checks.

My adult children with children, get back anywhere from $5, 000. to $6, 000.00 in taxes since Bush has been in office.

If we had not gone to Iraq you could have really kissed the middle east oil goodbye! You think gas is high now. Also you don't just end a war. Bring all those military reserves home now and you are all going to be really hurting the job market.

You don't hear the military people begging to come home. That is because they signed on for a job and they are doing it. They also know because they are there that we need to be there.

My husband spent 23 years in the Military and we know why the war is going on. Just as our son that is in Fallujah, Iraq, the son that has 5 children and a wife waiting at home, knows why we are in Iraq. You don't hear us whinning about being in Iraq. Who do you have over there that knows what is going on, really going on! Those people really did need us.

If we hadn't made a stand in Iraq and if we had kept rolling over on our backs to those people, they were being raised to hate and want us dead. Now they are learning that American's are good people and the new generation of young people in the Middle East will learn to care about this world as we do, they are learning that from our Military personal. Military personal that are actually caring for those people for the first time is their Iraqie lives.

The Social Security Retirement Plan was raided years before Bush got into office by Democrats that feel they have a right to taking our money as they give themselves raises. Actually if you think about it Bush, tired to put the Social Security system back in the peoples hands to let us invest it for months. He spent months on the road trying to give us our Social Security back, while Democrats fought him all the way, just waiting till they are back in office to stick their greedy hands back in that pot! All the while sending billions to overseas countries to improve their lot in life while making this country poorer and poorer.

Bush has given more back to the people than any President has that I know of. He just doesn't get on the radio every week bragging about what he has done for this country.

Tax breaks to the super rich Boloney! That cry is as old as the world is. The Super Rich pay taxes too. Whaaa! Cry about something that is real. Get out and do something to be rich. Go to tax school and learn how to get tax's breaks. Stop whinning that a Democrat it going to make a difference.

The Super Rich get rich because of hard work, which this country gives us the right to do. Work hard and make your own breaks. You could be the Super Rich next, that is the right this country gives you.

You sound like a Democrat pawn.

WAKE UP AMERICA!

Many economists are critical of the Bush administration's policies and argue that the economy is only benefiting the wealthy, increasing inequality between the top 1% and the rest of society. Economists Aviva Aron-Dine and Richard Sherman point to recent data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), showing that "the average after-tax income of the richest one percent of households rose from $722,000 in 2003 to $868,000 in 2004, after adjusting for inflation, a one-year increase of nearly $146,000, or 20 percent. This increase was the largest increase in 15 years, measured both in percentage terms and in real dollars."According to economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty, who reviewed income tax returns for all income groups since 1917, found that in 2005, the top 1% received its largest share of gross income since 1928.Economist John Weeks asserts that increased income inequality in the U.S., one of only four high-income OECD countries to experience a significant increase in inequality, is largely the result of a less progressive taxation structure, the weakening strength of labor unions, which has resulted in "a growing imbalance in the economic and political power of capital and labor."
Economists Peter Orzsag and William Gale described the Bush tax cuts as reverse government redistribution of wealth, "[shifting] the burden of taxation away from upper-income, capital-owning households and toward the wage-earning households of the lower and middle classes."Between 2003 and 2004, following the 2003 tax cuts, the share of after-tax income going to the top 1% rose from 12.2 percent in 2003 to 14.0 percent in 2004. (This followed the period from 2000 to 2002, where after-tax incomes declined the most for the top 1%.) As the income of the top 1% rose considerably faster than that of the bottom 99%, the share of overall tax liabilities of the top 1% still increased from 22.9% to 25.3%, despite the cuts.
The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate rose from 4.2% in January 2001, peaking at 6.3% in June 2003, to 5.0% in December 2007. The avereage seasonably adjusted unemployment rate for this time span was 5.1%.

and you, madam, sound like a typical republican.