Welcome!


Join more than 151,000 members on FunAdvice to ask questions, share advice, photos and make new friends today.
FunAdvice RSS for this page:
Rss_feed

Morality?

Man Utd Asked by emcg 10 months ago, 17 answers.

In your opinion is da death penalty right or wrong (moral or immoral)

internet Answered by kingofpop on Jan 17, 2009, 04:23PM
327 answers

I see, so you demand facts from me while providing none for your statement that the death penalty is a strong deterrent to crime. Sounds fair.

Luckily, there actually are facts that support my claim. What I'm saying is that, yes...states which have the death penalty, also have more crime. At the very least, they don't see less crime as a result of having the death penalty.

The Death Penalty Information Center website (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/) has quite a bit of information on this. One interesting statistic is that nine of the ten states with the highest murder rate, also have the death penalty. That includes Texas, which has the second highest number of executions per capita.

A number of other studies have also shown that executing people does not lower, or have any impact on, the murder rate:
Sorenson, J., Wrinkle, R., Brewer, V., Marquart, J. 1999. Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Examining the Effect of Executions on Murder in Texas. 45 Crime and Delinquency. pp. 481-493.

There are many, many other studies and statistics, which I can provide.

So, the deterrent argument is out. I'm actually surprised you brought it up. Most people that do any research on the death penalty are already aware that deterrence is not a viable defense.

1 person thought this was helpful
Jasmine You (Versailles ~Phlharmonic Quintet~) Answered by yumiyukai on Jan 15, 2009, 03:40PM
2513 answers

I don't believe in death penalty, but I think life in prison is meant for anyone who even breaks one law. How could you trust them again?? they let them go too easy and that's why America is so F***ed up right now.

Answered by emilyv on Jan 15, 2009, 03:40PM
12 answers

I'm not really for or against but I can't feel bad for someone who gets the death penalty for taking someones life, especially if that life is a child's.

internet Answered by kingofpop on Jan 15, 2009, 03:46PM
327 answers

There is no logical reason for having a death penalty, nor is there a sufficient moral defense. Most progressive countries have banned it.

Answered by grrrness on Jan 15, 2009, 03:46PM
24 answers

OMGseriously I did an entire tournament on this sh**
although it was simple

Answered by grrrness on Jan 15, 2009, 03:49PM
24 answers

not moral dude after processing the amount evidence I had to process it cost roughly 100,000 bucks a year ta keep them locked up thats not worth it gone ahead and killem plus death is better than prison anyway

Answered by chloealayne on Jan 15, 2009, 03:50PM
3 answers

I belive in the death penalty. I just did a exam on the death penalty.
anyone who takes someones life or does something horrriable enough to even get the consideration of being charged with the death penalty should get it.

Me On Christmas Day Answered by rachelchunter on Jan 15, 2009, 04:17PM
447 answers

Although there are many people who deserve the death penalty, I believe it's still wrong. Whoever takes part in ending the criminal's life is just as much of a murderer as the criminal would be. It does say in the Bible that only God has the right to take someone's life away. Anything else is murder. I'm thankful that we don't have the death penalty where I live. Whether a person deserves it or not they shouldn't punish murder with murder. That's like saying to someone, You stole from me, so I'm going to steal from you. All this death to criminals stuff doesn't get us anywhere. I'd hate to be part of all this because I wouldn't want the life of a person on my conscience for the rest of my life, even if they do deserve it.

Me when I'm busy Answered by arachnid on Jan 16, 2009, 01:07AM
1772 answers

I don't think a society should have the right to terminate the life of one of its members, regardless of the crime. Quite apart from anything else, innocent people _do_ get convicted - far too often, at that - and while you can release someone from jail, you can't un-kill them.

For those arguing cost: In the US, putting someone to death costs _more_ over the duration of their stay than incarcerating them indefinitely would likely have cost.

In darkness and light the truth remains Answered by jester_x on Jan 16, 2009, 03:31AM
883 answers

Its absolutely wrong. There is no situation that the government should be allowed to take a life. And like arachnid said innocent people get convicted all the time.

Beautiful Answered by umbe on Jan 16, 2009, 12:50PM
89 answers

wrong
because if you think about it it is just the same as muder,eg mudering someon by stabbing or shooting them.
GOD SAID DO NOT MUDERhappy

womanoffaith Answered by faithfulgirl27 on Jan 16, 2009, 05:08PM
67 answers

It is wrong and I think its the easy way out ,having to spend the rest of your life inprison and think about the acts you have commited over and over is what you call punishment.

Answered by silverwings on Jan 16, 2009, 06:43PM
1515 answers

If justice is administered fairly, and the crime is terrible, yes, I believe our government has the right to implement the death penalty. The persons soul is the most important thing, and there is always ample time for that person to repent before death actually comes.

I think it is a strong deterant to crime.

My hair's cute. (: Answered by brandyytoxxiccc on Jan 17, 2009, 09:25AM
37 answers

..It depends on the case, and what happened. I'm for it, yet I'm against it at the same time.

In most cases, people have to do the whole death sentance because they did something really bad. You have to look at it from both sides, either you kill them and they aren't living anymore [obviously,] Or you keep them in prison till they die, and make them suffer. Either way, they're not going to be happy with the outcome.
Most countys and towns use religion as a factor to weither or not they get revolved with a death sentance.

(; -B.

internet Answered by kingofpop on Jan 17, 2009, 01:55PM
327 answers

***I think it is a strong deterant to crime.***

The state of Texas is overwhelming proof to the contrary.

Answered by silverwings on Jan 17, 2009, 02:52PM
1515 answers

***I think it is a strong deterant to crime.***

The state of Texas is overwhelming proof to the contrary.

~~~
I would be interested to hear the facts behind your statement, if you have them avaialble.

According to this line of thinking, you are saying that a state that implements the death penalty...

actually causes more crime???

IN the third world countries, where a person caught stealing looses an arm...

I think the crime rate remains low.

internet Answered by kingofpop on Jan 18, 2009, 05:49AM
327 answers

***IN the third world countries, where a person caught stealing looses an arm...***

OK, first of all, please specify which countries you're talking about.

Secondly, I can't believe you'd want to model the US penal code after a system like that. Your other responses here indicate you at least think the Constitution was a good idea. What do you think about the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment? If chopping a person's arm off for stealing doesn't fit that definition, I don't know what does.

The US founders, students of the Enlightenment, were horrified by the corporal punishment that had existed in Europe for centuries. They did not want the US going in that direction. Today, with the death penalty, the existence of Gitmo, and the torture of enemy combatants, one can only hope those Enlightenment ideals become reality again...soon.

Answer this Question: "Morality?"

Your Answer: HTML is not allowed.



Religion & Spirituality Photos

my pic

Share this question

Copy and paste this code:
It will display on your blog or site like this:
Morality?