Bush no more

Aren't you guys happy that Bush is not going to be president no more in Nov.?

I dont agree, Yes bush wasted money in war, But has anything else happened in the U.S since 9/11 no I dont think so, Not for the reason that the terrorist did not want to but because they havent had a chance, Im expressing what I think,

violinist_in_florida, did Bush only become president on 9/12/01? If you are going to give credit to Bush for not having an attack since 9/12/01, then he should bear the responisibility of it happening on under his watch on 9/11. The fact is, he did nothing to prevent 9/11 in the first place, and he had ample warnings.

Also bush was elected rwo times for a reason, So I dont think the people think he is all that bad, Also since the democratic party is the larges of the tree partys, That means bush actually got elected by democratic citizens, I wonder why he got elected?

Bush was not elected either time. In 2000 he outright lost, but a republican majority on the supreme court appointed him anyway. And the second time, he won by fraud. The election was fixed. It is statisitcally impossible for Bush to have actually won that election. We can look for more of the same from the republicans this time around. That is why turnout for Obama is going to be crucial.

Hells yah im glad hes no longer going 2 b president!!!

No. I was for G. Bush and going to be sad to see him leave the office. I personally think he was an awesome President. I think he did everything that he should have done, a.k.a.. the war and whatever else everyone else disagrees on. Ha.

I think people need to just stop hating on poor G. Bush. 3

Yes.

Gone finally about time my uncle dead because of him. Rott

As an American living abroad, there is one thing I'm looking forward to regarding the end of the Bush presidency. I'm hoping fewer people will ask me about American politics and government.

Haha, I agree with religionisgood, I hate it when non americans ask me about President Bush, etc. I just feel so guilty. Plus, I hate complaining and talking negatively, which is what I usually do when the subject comes to Bush

And the second time, he won by fraud. The election was fixed. It is statisitcally impossible for Bush to have actually won that election. We can look for more of the same from the republicans this time around. That is why turnout for Obama is going to be crucial.

Good Lord, how'd the Bush hating media miss that one, and not drag it to the headlines once a month??

.Even tho I consider myself a moderate conservative, and vote pretty much a Republican Ticket...I can honestly say... yes, I'm glad that Bush is leaving office.

p

Sorry to break the news, but Bush will still be President until the end of January 2009.

Good Lord, how'd the Bush hating media miss that one, and not drag it to the headlines once a month??

That's easy. Because there is no Bush hating media. If there was, he would have been impeached long ago. There is absolute proof that Bush could not have won in 2004. Of the 11 battle ground states in 2004, 10 of them had exit polling that was very different from the actually vote tallies and fell outside the margin of error. The fact that that many states (and all of them battleground states) fell outside the margin of error is extremely suspect. Now add to that fact that all 10 of those states not only were wildly different from exit polling data, every single one of them was wrong in favor of Bush, and every single one of them used black box voting machines. It is statisitically impossible for that many states to all be that different from the exit polling, and all in the same direction.

And don't give me any nonsense about exit polling being inaccurate. They have always been remarkably accuarate. That is untill Florida in 2000.

John Conyers tried to look into in 2004, but of course the republican controlled congress at the time would not allow it.