Home » Interests » Politics » Barack vs. Hillary

Welcome!


FunAdvice is a social question & answer site where you can make friends, share photos and meet people near you.
FunAdvice RSS for this page:
Rss_feed

Barack vs. hillary

This is a random pic Asked by sugarangel2 21 days ago, 23 answers.

Who do you think will win the election? Barrack Obama or Hillary Clinton? Who do you WANT to win?

Send this to a friend
my brother(not in the usc shirt) and a friend(in the usc shirt) Answered by brit619 on Apr 22, 2008, 08:27PM
| 133 answers.

I want hilary clinton to win. GO HILARY CLINTON!!!

I'm colourful. Answered by stephanief987 on Apr 22, 2008, 08:29PM
| 4293 answers.

Well I'm Canadian but I've been following with things and I'd have to say I hope Barrack Obama wins.

Answered by catfocksehcni9 on Apr 22, 2008, 08:30PM
| 75 answers.

RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL!

| 0 of 1 thought this was helpful
This was sposed to be a joke.but I love it. Answered by mrscobainx3 on Apr 22, 2008, 08:30PM
| 922 answers.

Barack Obama.
No question.

Me! Answered by editor on Apr 22, 2008, 08:31PM
| 1451 answers.

Well, the election isn't between them. The nomination is between them. If you're asking who I think will win the nomination, I think Obama...but then he'll have to go against McCain for the election, and who knows who will win that.

dog Answered by amblessed on Apr 22, 2008, 08:34PM
| 4936 answers.

Want: Neither - Hillary will somehow influence the Supe-Delegates to ignore the cacus vote/majority vote of the people and hand it to her instead.

Answered by soheb on Apr 22, 2008, 10:59PM

I THINK THAT HILLARY WILL WIN BECAUSE WOMENS ARE NOW GROWING IN POWER and MOST are NOW ACCEPTING.

A different picture of me Answered by katwoman on Apr 22, 2008, 11:22PM
| 251 answers.

I don't really care. But if I had to say, I'd go with Hilary, only because I thought Bill Clinton was a good president. Maybe some of him will rub off on her. It would be a first, wouldn't it? Husband and wife as President.

Halloween. Answered by underwaterophelia on Apr 23, 2008, 06:04AM
| 931 answers.

There's no way Obama is winning the nomination.
And there's probably no way Hillary is winning the election.

Answered by jimahl on Apr 23, 2008, 08:20AM
| 551 answers.

There is no way Hillary can win. Her win last night did little to eat into the lead obama has over her. And amblessed is wrong. There is no way the superdelegates overturn the popular vote. She needed a much bigger win than she got. She would have had to have a 20 point difference, and that was never going to happen. And all of the remaining races will be much closer than this. Obama will win NC big, and Indiana will be close.

And although they keep saying she had a 10 point win, the actual difference is closer to 9 points.

Answered by briand88 on Apr 23, 2008, 12:25PM
| 292 answers.

I would rather Hillary win. Honestly I think she is more openminded than Obama. Obama is good for race rights and religion rights, but when it comes to women's rights and gay rights he isn't nearly as strong as Clinton. She covers all the areas thoroughly. People say that she's too unfeminine basically, but really she's just a very strong woman and if she was girly she wouldn't make as good of a leader. If she couldn't talk without giggling, would you vote for her? I hope to God not. She's a strong independent woman, a real woman, and what irks people I think, about her, is that she isn't quite in the norm with what they are used to. We still have a very sexist nation that is convinced that girls should stay girly and guys manly. I think she would be a strong leader and she has an awesome healthcare plan. She has already lived in the White House so she has tons more experience than Obama. She can always consult Bill if she has an issue, he can always help, it would be like having two presidents, twice the efficiency. Obama is more popular because he is eloquent and he is what is expected. He looks and sounds like a revolutionary, like he can get a crowd going and stuff. However, so could Hitler, not that Obama wants to do anything terrible, but I think that our president should treat their office as a job, not a chance to rule over people and convince them of things.
Brian D.

Answered by jimahl on Apr 23, 2008, 01:28PM
| 551 answers.

Briand88, please show where Hillary and Obama's stances on womens and gays rights differ that much.

No one doubts she is a strong woman, and I agree that that is why some people really hate her. But most of them aren't voting for Obama either.

She does not have tons more experience than Obama. Obama actually has served in public office for 13 years and Clinton only 8 years. Living in the white house is a far cry from being president.

Obama message is not about 'a chance to rule over people'. That is just ridiculous. He uses the term 'we' all the time, she uses the term 'I' all the time.

He has consistantly taken the high road, while she has had no problem slinging the mud when ever she can.

Answered by briand88 on Apr 23, 2008, 06:03PM
| 292 answers.

There actual stances don't differ, but when it comes actually to carrying all that bs out Hillary stands up for those rights a little more than Obama. The hitler thing was just a drastic example of the same deal. They both sling plenty of mud, they're politicians. It doesn't really matter anyone though, it's just politics.

the beatles Answered by iamcool on Apr 23, 2008, 11:02PM
| 546 answers.

I think it would be best if Hillary won, and Barack got vice-president, so then he could get some expearience and then run for president next term, because then he would certainly get it.

Answered by jimahl on Apr 24, 2008, 06:26AM
| 551 answers.

'There actual stances don't differ, but when it comes actually to carrying all that bs out Hillary stands up for those rights a little more than Obama. '

And what are basing this assertion on? I am not saying she hasn't been a good advocate for them (I know, she is my senator), but so has Obama.

'The hitler thing was just a drastic example of the same deal. They both sling plenty of mud, they're politicians. It doesn't really matter anyone though, it's just politics.'

This is not true at all. They both criticize each other, that is just politics. But she has jumped at every miscue or flub that Obama has made. Her campaign ran ads attacking obama about the wright issue and the bitter comment. He could have easily taken out ads over her lie about landing under sniper fire in bosnia. He chose to take the high road. Obama is trying to avoid negative campaigning.

It does matter to me. Obama is clearly a different type of presidential candidate, and I think it is what this country needs right now.

She can not win and shoudl drop out. She is hurting the party.

Answered by briand88 on Apr 24, 2008, 08:57PM
| 292 answers.

I told you I didn't care. It's politics, no matter what politician runs the country, they are still going to make life suck for everyone. You getting so defensive and obviously angry about it, just makes me sad. There is no reason to get that upset about another person's political opinion. You can get as upset as you want at a politician's decision. You will never convince anyone to listen to you if you argue or discuss things with the sole point of proving the other person wrong. It makes you seem like a jackass. Then the direct quotations, that just gets on my nerves. Politics is nothing when compared to life itself. I believe in either socialism or anarchism. I am not comfortable in a capitalist society, so I don't vote, I'm leaving as soon as I'm done with college to be in the marines so I don't have to participate in society. My girl is going to Africa because she hates it even more than me. Please refrain from arguing more, because it is utterly pointless and very politicianly of you. Gracias,
Brian D.

yessss.....lol Answered by saucybaby on Apr 25, 2008, 12:16AM
| 359 answers.

Barrack Obama

Answered by jimahl on Apr 25, 2008, 07:43AM
| 551 answers.

Biran, what makes you think I am angry? Trust me, I don't get angry over message boards on the internet. If you make a statement on a public board like 'There actual stances don't differ, but when it comes actually to carrying all that bs out Hillary stands up for those rights a little more than Obama.', then you should be prepared to have someone respond, or at least not be surprised someone asks you what you base the comment on. If you don't want to answer fine. But I am not arguing, I am discussing. And when civil people disagree, they discuss things. If you don't want to, fine.

It seems because my opinion differs from yours, you are the one who is arguing.

Good luck in the marines...

dog Answered by amblessed on Apr 25, 2008, 04:51PM
| 4936 answers.

Seen on the net (don't know if it's true or not) :-)

John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama were walking down a Washington
D.C. street when they came upon a homeless person.

The Republican, John McCain, gave the homeless person his business card and told
him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20 out of his pocket and gave
it to the homeless person.

Hillary was very impressed. When they came upon another homeless person she
decided to help. She walked over to the homeless person and gave him directions
to the welfare office. She then reached into John McCain's pocket and got out
$20. She kept $15 for her administrative fees and gave the homeless person $5.

When they came upon yet another homeless person Barak told the homeless person
to 'have hope...change is coming...' and gave him nothing.

Now do you understand the difference?

Answered by jimahl on Apr 27, 2008, 03:42PM
| 551 answers.

Yada yada yada. Well I know you didn't make this up amblessed. So instead of having substantive discussions about real issues, you post republican propagnda. Obama was a communitiy organizer, and did much at a grass roots level. As president of the harvard law review, he could have done anything, but he chose work with the people. Old man McCoot hasn't a clue about average americans, much less the poor.

Got anything better than that?

Answered by nkg76 on Apr 29, 2008, 01:47PM
| 26 answers.

Hillary.

dog Answered by amblessed on Apr 29, 2008, 02:54PM
| 4936 answers.

4/29/08: FINALLY, Barak 'I can no more disown Rev. Wright than the black community' Obama, has had a sudden change - people I know came to that very same conclusion (Wright is wrong) a very long time ago - just 48 hrs ago he was defending Rev. Wright - today the sudden change - some chickens have apparently come home to Roost !

This is me!! Answered by cheerleader4life on May 10, 2008, 11:29AM
| 12 answers.

OBAMA ALL THE WAY!!!

Answer this Question: "Barack vs. Hillary"

Your Answer: HTML is not allowed.


Back to top




 

Related Photos

... saddam hussein execution Marion Cotillard Oscar winning CHANGE IS GOOD Act NOW bush