Adam and eve

Can some one tell me the story,
Was dinsors first?
Or them?
Cave men?
OR them I'm so confused.

adam and eve isnt true
unless you want to beleive youve all been practicing incest and having sex with your relatives
because adam and eves children would have had sex with each other to make you
anyway
there have been animals long before the animals of the jurassic period (dinosaurs)
cave men and prehistoric men came long AFTER the dinosaurs
and there were animals living LONG before dinosaurs

Well, dinosaurs existed long before man, so they were here first.

I don't actually believe in the Adam and Eve story.

Adam was created first by God then being a typical guy who couldnt look after himself, God took a rib from Adam and created Eve.

I dont believe in cave men but I'm sure there WERE feral men and women living in caves in the BC era

Read the book of Genesis and you'll see the order in which the beginning took place and how events unfolded...Take care !!

amblessed, I must have missed the part in Genesis that talked about the dinosaurs. Did he destroy them before he created man? Because they never existed together. Unless you are acutally chalenging proven scientific discoveries?

The story of adam and eve, and all of genesis is just a myth. There is no doubt we evolved from more primative primates. It is proven, regardless of what some zealots might say.

Adam and Eve are fictional characters, just like Tom Sawyer and Superman.

...heyyy... stop that crazy talk... Superman is REAL. Haven't you read his comics?

**I must have missed the part in Genesis that talked about the dinosaurs. Did he destroy them before he created man?***

Well it was not called dinosaurs back then. It was called leviathen, dreagons etc. You will find them in the Bible but not in genesis. Neither so I find lions and tigers in Genesis. How silly can your arguments be?

***The story of adam and eve, and all of genesis is just a myth. There is no doubt we evolved from more primative primates. It is proven, regardless of what some zealots might say.***

That sounds like a claim to me. Well evidences please.

***Adam and Eve are fictional characters, just like Tom Sawyer and Superman.***

Again another claim. Evidences?

Well it was not called dinosaurs back then. It was called leviathen, dreagons etc. You will find them in the Bible but not in genesis. Neither so I find lions and tigers in Genesis. How silly can your arguments be?

So all that evidence that proves that dinosaurs were long gone by the time man showed up is just wrong? How silly can your belief be?

That sounds like a claim to me. Well evidences please.

You can start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
Let me know when you read and actually understand it, and then I will give you something a little more detailed.

***Adam and Eve are fictional characters, just like Tom Sawyer and Superman.***

Again another claim. Evidences?

Doyou think you are being clever here? You want him to show you evidence that a fictional character is fictional? I am sure he can show you evidence that adam and eve are fictional when you can show him superman is fictional.

Well, I believe that God created Adam and Eve first. Adam started as a bit of dust and God created him so he can take care of all the animals. Then, God felt He needed to create a partner for Adam. So, while Adam was sleeping, God took out a rib and created a woman, called Eve. Then, they ate the fruit of that tree and God gave them punishments for their sins, and kicked them out of the Garden of Eden. Then they had a bunch of kids. The end.

Leviathans(sea monsters), and dragons aren't real, neither are giants, cockatrices, or unicorns

...or any of the other mythical creatures found in the Bible, including god.

Dinosaurs existed and went extinct millions of years before the rise of man.

Humans evolved from hominids, that evolved from earlier primates, that evolved from earlier mammals, that evolved from mammal-like reptiles, that evolved from amphibians, that evolved from protoamphibians(acanthostega), that evolved from fish

...and all the way back to the prebiotic molecule.

god created animals first in the bible. well in the bible it say the next day he creates stuff but god has no time so the next day to us could be thousands of years time enough for dinosours to go extintc I guess

***So all that evidence that proves that dinosaurs were long gone by the time man showed up is just wrong? How silly can your belief be?***

That shows you biasness towards evidences. Like I said before you don't want to know the truth. There were stones found dated back to several hundreds of years before Christ that had pictures of Dinosaurs. Many ancient cave drawings have been discovered showing man fighting dinosaurs. We with our advanced technology have figured out Dinosaurs looked. How would these ancient civilizations know of Dinosaurs if they were not living with them? Moreover can the scientists say that the Dinosaurs went extinct just because they haven't spotted a live one? There are reports of over 5000 sitings of dinosaurs. But all of them are not valid because none of them were scientists of were able to capture it on a camera.

***You can start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
Let me know when you read and actually understand it, and then I will give you something a little more detailed.***

Oh! Here comes the real science... I could also show you many sites but you would say they are not real science.

***Do you think you are being clever here? You want him to show you evidence that a fictional character is fictional? I am sure he can show you evidence that adam and eve are fictional when you can show him superman is fictional.***

Well when I had told you that macro evolution was fictional did you not ask me for evidence? Well he is now telling us that our first parents wee fictional, what is his evidence?

***Dinosaurs existed and went extinct millions of years before the rise of man.
Humans evolved from hominids, that evolved from earlier primates, that evolved from earlier mammals, that evolved from mammal-like reptiles, that evolved from amphibians, that evolved from protoamphibians(acanthostega), that evolved from fish***

Nice story.

***god created animals first in the bible. well in the bible it say the next day he creates stuff but god has no time so the next day to us could be thousands of years time enough for dinosours to go extintc I guess***

Well God exists out of time I agree with that but He was creating the earth and it existed within time. The day is clearly stated as evening and morning. I do not know weather the Earth took 24 hours or more or less at that time but it surely did not take millions of years to make a rotation. The day mentioned there is clearly one rotation of the earth. Therefore dinosaurs were very much there at that time.

That shows you biasness towards evidences.

The only bias I have toward your evidence is the fact that there is nothing to support it.

Like I said before you don't want to know the truth.

That is pretty laughable.

There were stones found dated back to several hundreds of years before Christ that had pictures of Dinosaurs. Many ancient cave drawings have been discovered showing man fighting dinosaurs. We with our advanced technology have figured out Dinosaurs looked. How would these ancient civilizations know of Dinosaurs if they were not living with them?

Wow, you really know how to make assumptions. On one hand we have fossil records that we KNOW are hundreds of millions of years old, and on the other hand we have drawings by cavemen that kinda resemble dinosaurs. Which evidence to you sounds more compelling?

Moreover can the scientists say that the Dinosaurs went extinct just because they haven't spotted a live one? There are reports of over 5000 sitings of dinosaurs. But all of them are not valid because none of them were scientists of were able to capture it on a camera.

You are really losing it if you think there are still dinosaurs alive today. There have also been thousands of sighting of elvis. Does that prove he is really still alive? You are right, some people just saying they saw a dinosaur is not valid evidence. Your inability to comprehend even the sightest idea of what constitutes scientific evidence is quite comical.

Oh! Here comes the real science... I could also show you many sites but you would say they are not real science.

No, it is not me who would say they are not real science, it is real SCIENTISTS who would say so.

Well when I had told you that macro evolution was fictional did you not ask me for evidence?

First off, it was not me who said anything to you about macroevolution. I think it was captainassisin who you were talking to about that. And he did not ask you to show evidence it is fictional, he showed you evidence it is real. There is a big difference.

Well he is now telling us that our first parents wee fictional, what is his evidence?

Where is your evidence the superman is not fictional? You are making yourself look silly when you make this kind of argument.

Well God exists out of time I agree with that but He was creating the earth and it existed within time. The day is clearly stated as evening and morning. I do not know weather the Earth took 24 hours or more or less at that time but it surely did not take millions of years to make a rotation. The day mentioned there is clearly one rotation of the earth. Therefore dinosaurs were very much there at that time.

This is just so idiotic. If you want to believe these fantasies, fine go ahead. But please don't make yourself look any stupider by actually suggesting there is one shred of scientific evidence to support this nonsense.

***The only bias I have toward your evidence is the fact that there is nothing to support it.***

Neither is there anything to support your. Your repeating this will not get you anywhere.

***Wow, you really know how to make assumptions. On one hand we have fossil records that we KNOW are hundreds of millions of years old, and on the other hand we have drawings by cavemen that kinda resemble dinosaurs. Which evidence to you sounds more compelling?***

Why would select the more what seems to be the more compelling? What about the other evidence? What is your answer to that?

***You are really losing it if you think there are still dinosaurs alive today. There have also been thousands of sighting of elvis. Does that prove he is really still alive? You are right, some people just saying they saw a dinosaur is not valid evidence. Your inability to comprehend even the sightest idea of what constitutes scientific evidence is quite comical.***

How dumb are you? Where have there been sightings of elves? Ridiculing seems to be your tactic when you don't have answers.

***First off, it was not me who said anything to you about macroevolution. I think it was captainassisin who you were talking to about that. And he did not ask you to show evidence it is fictional, he showed you evidence it is real. There is a big difference.***

You as always again missed the point. When I said macro evolution was fictional was I not asked for evidence? Then why should I not ask you for evidence when you say Adam and Eve are fictional? Do you understand this question or not? By the way captainassisin showed me no evidences.

***By the way captainassisin showed me no evidences.***

You've been shown evidence, and you simply ignored it, as usual. Uh oh, once again, the time has come for you to take another lap.

You need to re-learn the difference between evidence and proof.

The fact remains... aspects of evolution have been PROVEN to occur. There are NO aspects of creationism that have be proven to occur. Deal with it.

***The fact remains... aspects of evolution have been PROVEN to occur. There are NO aspects of creationism that have be proven to occur. Deal with it.***

You don't see the point.. Evolutionists say that life on this earth has come about by evolution. But actually what they mean is life came about by macro evolution I.e. one kind of animal changing into different kinds of animal. That is what I have questioned. What evidence is there to show that this took place? You have not shown me any evidence for this.

You don't HAVE a point...

Evidence, TANGIBLE evidence has been presented to you TIME AND TIME AND TIME AGAIN. Does this tangible evidence PROVE the evolutionists are RIGHT? NO. It just makes the theory more credible. But you still won't acknowledge it. Do you think if you personally IGNORE the existence of evolutionary evidence will somehow make evolution LESS credible? Well it doesn't... it only makes YOU less credible.

You can keep chasing your tail. You're just in denial, and/or too deluded to think objectively. So keep on spinning, I'll be there to correct you, as usual.

***The ancient cave drawings and pictures aren't of dinosaurs, because humans and dinosaurs didn't coexist***

You don't see things clearly. You are saying that the cave drawings could not be dinosaurs because you were taught that dinos and man did not co-exist. Well you have been taught wrong information and these discoveries show you that. If you look at the pictures it is obvious that those are pictures of dinos.

***Of course dinosaurs aren't in the Bible, god didn't know anything ancient men didn't. ***

How do you expect the Bible to mention them when the term dinosaur was coined in the 18th century? Evidently by some other name.

***Evidence, TANGIBLE evidence has been presented to you TIME AND TIME AND TIME AGAIN. Does this tangible evidence PROVE the evolutionists are RIGHT? NO. It just makes the theory more credible. But you still won't acknowledge it. Do you think if you personally IGNORE the existence of evolutionary evidence will somehow make evolution LESS credible? Well it doesn't... it only makes YOU less credible.***

I am not trying to make evolution less credible. Science has made it.

The study of fossils and mutations ranks as the two key evidences of evolution: The fossil evidence proves or disproves whether evolution has occurred in the past. Mutational facts prove or disprove whether it can occur at all and evolutionists claim mutation is the process by which evolution comes about . Scientists have strong evidence that mutations can never bring about any positive changes. Therefore evolution cannot happen at all. There are no evidences for evolution but only claims that some fossils are evidences.

You don't see things clearly. You are saying that the cave drawings could not be dinosaurs because you were taught that dinos and man did not co-exist. Well you have been taught wrong information and these discoveries show you that. If you look at the pictures it is obvious that those are pictures of dinos.

So you are asking people to believe that drawings in caves that look a little like prehistoric animals is actual evidence they existed at the time of early man? But we are to ignore all the actual scientific data showing that know prehistoric creatures have never been found from that time period. Why is there not one fossil of a dinosaur found after 65 million years ago, and there are no fossil of modern man found prior to 160,000 years ago?

The study of fossils and mutations ranks as the two key evidences of evolution: The fossil evidence proves or disproves whether evolution has occurred in the past. Mutational facts prove or disprove whether it can occur at all and evolutionists claim mutation is the process by which evolution comes about . Scientists have strong evidence that mutations can never bring about any positive changes. Therefore evolution cannot happen at all. There are no evidences for evolution but only claims that some fossils are evidences.

You are just to blind or stupid to understand this stuff. You keep pointing out alleged inconsistancies in the science, which are based on your extremely limited knowledge of the subject matter, and use those as proof that an entire branch of science that has PROVEN that evolution occurs is just wrong.

Go learn something, and stop all the babbling...

***The study of fossils and mutations ranks as the two key evidences of evolution: The fossil evidence proves or disproves whether evolution has occurred in the past. Mutational facts prove or disprove whether it can occur at all and evolutionists claim mutation is the process by which evolution comes about.

IDIOT! FOR THE LAST TIME! EVIDENCE AND PROOF ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. And mutation is ONE way, not the ONLY way evolution occurs. As usual, you have NO IDEA what you're talking about. Until you actually gain the maturity and desire to learn about evolution from a CREDIBLE source, you'll remain ignorant, your views flawed, subjective, and misinformed.

You frequently claim people are blind to the truth, when you yourself continue to avoid the truth about a theory you don't support. When I say 'truth' I don't imply (like you) that the view is RIGHT, but I'm referring to general, established, easily accessible information ABOUT said topic. I think your REAL problem is your faith... its weak... so weak that you have to continuously LIE to yourself about evolution, and restrict the amount of information you access about it; because if you DIDN'T... it would actually MAKE SENSE... and that idea SCARES you.